What is the best motherboard and CPU combination for maximum overclocking?

Question

I'm not looking for the safest most stable overclocking, but the fastest possible overclocking.

Answer 1

If you get the fastest motherboard available, you would not gain much by overclocking. You see, overclocking was popular when you could gain 30% to 50%... In the early days of overclocking you could almost double your speed.

But with today's high speed CPUs and Bus, the best overclocking gains you almost no increase in speed.

You see, the limitation is the SPEED OF LIGHT. Clever motherboard layouts group the CPU and RAM as close together as possible. Of course, the ultimate speed in layout is Core 2 Duo. Here, the CPUs are very close to each other, with hope that more performance can be gained.

It kinda take the fun out of it, doesn't it?

Answer 2

Wow those first two guys are really good answerers, but on this question both are very bad. Okay for motherboards go with ASUS, they have the best motherboards for overclocking as they have good overclocking options. As for processors, something in the Core 2 Duo series is good. If you want the fastest possible, I would say go with the Core 2 Extreme, it has an unlocked multiplier. The most important element to fastest possible overclocking is actually the cooling, and if you are looking for top overclocking, I would get a good liquid cooling system.

Now what I take issue with is this statement that you cannot gain much by overclocking. If you take a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo, you can easily overclock it to 3.6Ghz with proper cooling, which by my calculations is a 50% increase. As for why you would need this, if you don't think that increase will give you a performance boost you are sadly mistaken. In addition, with proper cooling, overclocking can be stable.

Answer 3

each cpu is distinctive. say your chum has the precise comparable gadget setup as yours. its quite a threat that he can get an more suitable overclock. subsequently, you are able to not say in the past hand how severe a cpu can bypass. next ingredient, overclocking is strictly for BRAGGING RIGHTS. it many times never ends up in a very noticable overall performance improve. the only way you will word the version is that in case you employ a benchmarking software that checks your gadget (pcmark, 3dmark, etc). as an occasion, overclocking an older gadget would not advise that i will tournament a greater cutting-edge gadget. the two way, i tremendously reccommend which you do not overclock except you're optimistic which you quite opt for to squeeze that little bit of unoticable overall performance out on the risk of: reducing your cpu's/ video card's existence, voiding warranties, and a threat destruction of $xxx piece of hardware. additionally, overclocking your integrated pix gets you nowhere.

Answer 4

You won't gain much by overclocking,yes as the former paoster said it could get unstable but its not true it will get unstable if you overclock just by a few percent.
But,in realworld you would hardly notice the difference.
Get a dual core processor and wait for the next 64 bit OS,that would make more difference but you probably have windows and I saw and played a bit with vista but its horrible.
A mac would be a good choice,stable unix platform,dual cores and Leopard will come out in a couple of months ands its true 64 bits operating system.

Answer 5

With the mobos on the market today, why the flyin bejeesus would you need to overclock in the first place? Its gettin to the point that its gonna take 20 years to produce ANY software that needs a faster processor! To begin with, there is no such thing as stable overclocking!