What makes you liberals think that the Americans will stand by while sick countries develops nuke weapons?

Question

IT WON'T HAPPEN. Good men and women will not let evil thrive. vote democrat and you help end the world.

Answer 1

Hmmm . . .

Now didn't Bush invade Iraq where there were no wmd's but lots of oil, and leave North Korea alone when there were clearly wmds, but no oil?

What has the Republican president, Bush, done while North Korea developed their nukes? oh yeah, he's just stood by.

Answer 2

Conservative or Liberal=bull-@#*!
We allow evil to exist when we hate and cause give reasons for others to hate us.

The only reason we (America) gives a crap about the Middle East is oil! It is the power that gives Iran the power to buy "Nukes" Take out the big oil and use other means to power our country and let the middle east deal with it's own issues

Because we are involved in TWO non-conventional wars with an idiot as commander-in-chief, who know if we can win or "break-even" with that. How in the hell can we take on North Korea much less Iran?

There are more that enough "evil" men in power murdering people in Central America, South America, and Africa BUT there's no oil there so we really do not have the will or desire as a nation to do anything about it.

I say kick out all the idiots running the White House and Congress and get us off the oil and then maybe we can avoid WWIII.

Answer 3

America stood by and did nothing while china, pakistan, india, isreal, etc were devolping nukes.

And guess what, what did the Republicans do about it? Nothing!

So don't blame the nukes problems on the Democrats.

It's a scary world out there.

Answer 4

Why do you divide this issue along political lines? You should ask a better question instead of one filled with your obvious bias.

I am liberal and a "so called" Democrat, but I think we should nuke North Korean back to the stone age. What do you think about this liberal?

Instead of trying to attack people with a question, you should seek to educate your self with questions.

Answer 5

What do you propose we do about it?Start WW3?
Our armed forces are spread so thin we have to use our National Guard overseas.How many of our fine men and women need to be killed over these scare tactics?
Are you in the armed forces?If not when are you going to join?Have you sent your children to go and fight?
I served in Nam.Remember Nam?Remember all the wasted lives?If not go visit the WALL in Wash.DC It might put all this in perspective for you.I refused to waste the lives of my children so we can feel like we control the world.

Answer 6

Because liberalism is a horrible mental disorder. All libs should be locked away someplace nice and warm.
Sorry, no offense, but libs don't help matters very much.
I Cr 13;8a
10-14-6

Answer 7

Bush did stand by and let him develop nuclear weapons. Check the facts.

McCain's version of history goes beyond "revisionism" to outright falsification. It is the exact opposite of what really happened. Let's take a look at the plain facts.

In the spring of 1994, barely a year into Bill Clinton's presidency, the North Koreans announced that they were about to remove the fuel rods from their nuclear reactor (as a first step to reprocessing them into plutonium), cancel their commitment to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (which they had signed in 1985), and expel the international weapons inspectors (who had been guarding the rods under the treaty's authority).

Did Clinton "reward" them for doing these things, as McCain claims? Far from it. Not only did he push the U.N. Security Council to consider sanctions, he also ordered the Joint Chiefs of Staff to draw up plans to send 50,000 additional troops to South Korea—bolstering the 37,000 already there—along with more than 400 combat jets, 50 ships, and several battalions of Apache helicopters, Bradley fighting vehicles, multiple-launch rockets, and Patriot air-defense missiles. He also sent in an advance team of 250 soldiers to set up logistical headquarters for the influx of troops and gear.

He sent an explicit signal that removing the fuel rods would cross a "red line." Several of his former aides insist that if North Korea had crossed that line, he would have launched an airstrike on the Yongbyon reactor, even knowing that it might lead to war.

At the same time, Clinton set up a diplomatic backchannel, sending former President Jimmy Carter to Pyongyang for direct talks with Kim Il-Sung, then North Korea's dictator and the father of its present "dear leader," Kim Jong-il. (The official Washington line held that Carter made the trip on his own, but a recent memoir by three former U.S. officials, Going Critical: The First North Korean Nuclear Crisis, acknowledges that Clinton asked him to go.)

This combination of sticks and carrots led Kim Il-Sung to call off his threats—the fuel rods weren't removed, the inspectors weren't kicked out—and, a few months later, to the signing of the Agreed Framework.

McCain called the accord a "failure." This appraisal isn't quite as dead wrong as his claim that Clinton did nothing but toss Kim flowers. But it's highly misleading, to say the least.

The Agreed Framework of Oct. 21, 1994—a document that many cite but almost nobody seems to read—actually bottled up North Korea's nuclear program for eight years. Under its terms, Pyongyang kept the fuel rods locked up and kept the international inspectors on-site. In exchange, a multinational consortium, led by the United States and South Korea, was to provide North Korea with two light-water reactors to generate electricity. Gradually, Washington and Pyongyang were to establish diplomatic and trade relations. In an annex to the accord, drafted by the consortium and signed by all parties in June 1995, it was agreed that the nuclear fuel from the light-water reactors would be exported to a third country for recycling. (This, by the way, is what President Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin recently proposed that Iran do with its nuclear fuel.)

The accord fell apart, but not for the reasons that McCain and others have suggested. First, the U.S.-led consortium never provided the light-water reactors. (So much for the wild claims I've heard lately that North Korea got the bomb through Clinton-supplied technology.) Congress never authorized the money; the South Koreans, who were led by a harder-line government than the one in power now, scuttled the deal after a North Korean spy submarine washed up on their shores.

Second, when President George W. Bush entered the White House in January 2001, he made it clear, right off, that the Agreed Framework was dead and that he had no interest in further talks with the North Korean regime; his view was that you don't negotiate with evil, you defeat it or wait for it to crumble.

Third, a few months into Bush's term, evidence mounted that the North Koreans had been … not quite violating the Agreed Framework but certainly maneuvering around it. Confronted by U.S. intelligence data in October 2002, Pyongyang officials admitted that they'd been enriching uranium—an alternative route (though much slower than plutonium) to getting a bomb.

It should be noted that the bomb that the North Koreans set off on Sunday was apparently a plutonium bomb, not a uranium bomb. In other words, it was a bomb made entirely in Bush's time, not at all in Clinton's.

After the disclosure about the uranium, Bush hardened his stance against negotiations. The North Koreans tried to replay the events of 1994. They threatened to unlock the fuel rods, expel the inspectors, and quit the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Meanwhile, through back channels (former ambassadors Bill Richardson and Donald Gregg), they signaled a willingness to back off if the Agreed Framework was resuscitated. Bush wasn't interested in playing the game. Everything fell apart.

At the end of 2002, when the North Koreans really did unlock the rods and kick out the inspectors—when they crossed what Clinton had called the "red line"—Bush didn't take military action, he didn't call for sanctions, nor did he try diplomacy. It's Bush, not Clinton, who did nothing.

Answer 8

You have it all wrong. Vote democrat and we will work with diplomacy more thoroughly. Bush denied potential peace talks/negotiations with IRAN AND NORTH KOREA.
Vote republican and we will have the first ever nuclear war :(

Answer 9

Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!

Answer 10

Breaking News..... It's too late to stop the trainwreck now!