NO! Not unless there are other women to help do all the work. A group marriage might work, but I surely don't want to take care of 2 or more men plus all the children.
Peace!
2006-10-13 17:51:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by carole 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
No,
In a society in which egocentricity, self-gratification, narcissism, and selfishness are glorified, it has become more and more difficult to establish good relationships of any kind. People want desperately to find closeness and warmth, but they have forgotten the art of sharing, of communicating and cooperating, of adjusting. They have forgotten that lasting relationships require patience and forbearance. What is more, such relationships require concern and consideration, and even sacrifice.
A good marriage is an intimate and loving relationship which gives both partners security, friendship, companionship, support, comfort, and deep love that penetrates every aspect of life. None of this can be achieved without work and sacrifice.
Marriage may be compared to a plant that requires daily nurture, daily attention, daily care and cultivation. It will not develop of its own accord; only as effort and will are exerted will it grow and mature. For a marriage to succeed, both husband and wife must be committed to its success. They must build an enduring love relationship that is centered in the heart of their consciousness. Their relationship must be nurtured with the water of loyalty and love.
2006-10-13 18:03:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Me 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If that was the case, then marriage wouldnt be considered sacred, even more than now.It just wasnt meant to be that way, For example... adam and eve, not adam, eve, cheryl, and george? Its sad that these days and times people dont keep marriage sacred, and if thats what happened, why even have marriage or relationships? Everyone would just be going around from person to person, and there would be no families,no stable children and etc. So, absolutely not, I prefer to keep marriage sacred, just the way it was meant to be.
2006-10-13 17:56:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by luv2bawifenmom 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes. The hippies did it in the 60's. It was called a hippie commune.
2006-10-13 17:50:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Judy H 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
No thanks, I have my hands full with one!
Seriously though, I love my husband and wouldn't want to share that love with anyone else. He is special and he is the only one, he is the love of my life and I would not share my love with another.
2006-10-13 17:50:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No thank you 1 is definitely enough for me at one time.
2006-10-13 17:55:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by happy_cute_mom 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, i found one and he is my everything i dont need anybody else in my life. One good one is better than millions not good enough....i just confused myself :-) but anyway....i would never wanna have more than one bf....there is no point!
2006-10-13 17:53:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ashlee_Hbiba 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i would love to be with more then one man at a time!!
2006-10-13 17:54:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, partnership should only be between two people...i think having two boyfriends will cause problems and jealously...and morally, i dont think its right
2006-10-13 17:51:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by OnAJourney 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Absolutely not.
2006-10-13 23:33:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lydia 7
·
0⤊
0⤋