"If Black English Isn't a Language, Then Tell Me What Is?" What does he want readers to understand

Question

James Baldwin knows, of course, that so-called Black English could not be considered a distinct language, since most linguists would argue it follows most of the structural rules of standard English even while it has developed a few of its own distinct constructions over time. Why then does he title his essay "If Black English Isn't a Language, Then Tell Me What Is?" What does he want readers to know or understand about Black English? Why? As you discuss this essay, be sure and center your discussion around the following quote and connect it back to what you see Baldwin doing/attempting to do here (his purpose in writing):

Answer 1

Though Language Professors may argue the point, Eubonics is a language, Eubonics, in some cases, is known as "Black" English. Though this is a branch language, it does have distinct rules of its own that are accepted in much of the Black community. James Baldwin, in most of his commentary essays, poses questions that are left to the interpretation of the reader or practitioner. What I believe he desires the reader to know is that even in this modern age, with much of the new language deveopment coming from the cyber information highway, communities of people are practicing their own languages that are eveolving into accepted forms of communication.

Answer 2

politcal correctness is big business right now ,as if we all didn't know. Any gibberish that continues to keep the homoerectus breeds from accepting each other as brothers is touted as being "insightfull". Such "crap" should be dismissed by all of us humans. Baldwins assertions center around western culture, particularly the U.S. where breed diversification is at it's most and finest. While Baldwin and his ilk would point out the differences between us, the fact is, that in standard urbanian life, we all share the same struggles to raise our families, feed our children, and live decent lives. Unfortunately, there are a few that are so obsessed with human breed differences that they can't see the forrest 'cause of all the trees. While social and geographical differences give rise to various dialects, that doesn't mean these are different languages. Baldwin and company only use this example as a springboard to continue the stereotype of "opressed minority/ bigoted white guy". Why? Easy answer. If you really don't have anything intelligent or new to say, then just fall back on old hatred and say it loud. Todays university faculty, and todays media ( because they don't have anything intelligent or new to say) will give this "crap" full attention and coverage. Perhaps they haven't noticed that "we" , the white, black, brown, red, yellow, rainbow, breeds of AMERICANS have been living and working side by side, together for decades now, and we ALL speak ENGLISH! Just plain English. An that ain't so bad.

Answer 3

I don't like the Baldwin brothers

Answer 4

I never read Mr. Baldwin's aforementioned essay.

Answer 5

Looks to me like you just copied your homework assignment, and forgot that we have not read the Baldwin article.

Answer 6

It's an ethnic dialect.

Answer 7

What?