Some of you libs think the Iraqi people should have changed control on their own. So, I ask you how the above two are possible.
2006-10-13 16:45:57 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AqcEKk2nlLzeb6t6u0YbE3nsy6IX?qid=20061013202234AApGkVT
2006-10-13 16:46:45 · update #1
In the first place, the people of Iraq were not prisoners. Second, it's the reboobs that wanted to change the government in Iraq not the libs. We just think that if they wanted to do it, let them, why should we get involved. Last I checked Iraq was not one of the United States or its territories.
2006-10-13 16:58:16 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you are attempting to compare Iraq to a prison system then you are mistaken. The USA, Iran, Israel and etc. poured billions into Iraqi resistance groups and it only proved that Iraqis lacked the will/desire to resist their government.
However today, Iraqis are now resisting their foreign occupiers more then they did Saddam and with less resources.
2006-10-13 23:56:59 · answer #2 · answered by rian 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yep....if you're big enough and mean enough to make Bubby your beeeeatch.....you get to be THE MAN
2006-10-13 23:49:39 · answer #3 · answered by Keith 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Who knows... Im hungry Thanks for the points!!
2006-10-13 23:47:58 · answer #4 · answered by Niecy 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋