English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Peace talks and negotiations with countries like North Korea and Iran are fairly worthless. These leaders are not rational and their agendas are fairly insane. The world needs to agree to either need to cut them off at the knees economically and impose very strict sanctions on arms, food, money, goods, travel, basically everything in order to topple the current radical regimes, or blast them back to next Tuesday (probably the only option that will get their attention and make them comply). Coddling North Korea and Iran like bad children will get us nowhere, maybe blown to pieces, but that’s about it. So quit blaming Bush, and start looking back to Clinton. His unilateral approach was crap and the "Agreed Framework" was a joke. Hell, the Norks used our money to build their shiny new nukes. We gave them nuclear power plants for god sakes! What did we expect? Maybe they will make some extra cash when they some of their nuclear goodies to the Iranians. What do you think?

2006-10-13 16:29:06 · 18 answers · asked by honk2goose 4 in Politics & Government Politics

You can not reason with the unreasonable.

2006-10-13 16:29:26 · update #1

The Norks could also make some sweet cash selling that autographed Micheal Jordan basketball on ebay......

2006-10-13 16:30:37 · update #2

Remember, Kim Jong Il uses our aid to fund his weaponry, not feed his people. So, sanctions wouldn't strve his people any more than they already are.

2006-10-13 16:59:10 · update #3

18 answers

A classic response from the liberal above. No answer for a question, so they revert to default liberal mode: "Blame or Bash Bush".

I don't know why some people after all this time can not see what you and I and most of America see. North Korea has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that it can not be trusted. We have tried diplomacy for 14 years and the liberals answer is still: "try diplomacy". Even after it has failed miserably. Now, look where the UN and "diplomacy" has gotten us.

2006-10-13 16:35:36 · answer #1 · answered by Christopher 4 · 1 2

I guess I don't understand how you think Clinton had anything to do with attacking Iraq? Why do you people keep bringing his name up every time Bush makes a mistake?

And do you think just because the North Koreans have a crazy for a leader that we should kill them out by not allowing them any food or clean water? We was able to get along with N. K. till BUSH not Clinton called them Evil. Remember that? Yes both the leaders of N. K. and Iran need to be removed from power. So, lets do that not starve the people in the country. They have just been brain washed just like churches do peoples children in the USA. The Islam has millions brain washed in the middle east just like christanty does here.

Our problems are not Clinton or the Demos but the blame should go right on the sholders of Religion and Bush.

2006-10-13 16:47:59 · answer #2 · answered by Don K 5 · 0 1

sanctions on N Korea makes little sense when the people there are so poor that there eating the bark off trees,, even if China, their only supplier,, starves the people to death,, Kim Jong il won't suffer,,, Iran will either purchase nuclear from Russia or N Korea,, we have been looking back to Clinton,, to the 8 years of peace and prosperity in America and a surplus that Bush squandered,, just like he squandered the good will of Americans and people around the world after 9-11,, by invading Iraq,, provoking N Korea and Iran to nuclear wars..instead of going after Osama bin Laden,, the mastermind of the 9-11 attacks on the US,, the worlds #1 terrorist is being harbored and protected by Musharraf, president of Pakistan,, while George W, Bush promotes his book,, the Taliban have regained control of Afghanistan,, Bush wants NUCLEAR,,, but N Korea has him in a box,, so he wants to give nuclear weapons to Japan to use as a proxy like Israel,, to nuke N Korea,, how do you like his plan,, Reagan sold arms in the Iran Contra Affair,, Nixon was a pathetic lying unfit president,, what do you think will happen to Bush the nuclear war buff,,, life without parole maybe,, sounds good

2006-10-13 16:44:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Where have you been hiding for the past few months. Bush has finally come around and he too says he wants peace talks and negotiations. He and Condie have both said this week they they don't want war with Iran or N. Korea. They want to negotiate. Bush, in fact, has gone to the UN seeking resolutions regarding both Iran and N. Korea. He just has a hang-up about talking to them directly. Apparently he thinks Russia and China are better able to protect America's interests that we are. Isn't it ironic that Bush didn't trust the UN in his build up to war against Iraq. No, even though there has been no change in the UN, he now wants their support.

2006-10-13 16:39:23 · answer #4 · answered by rec 3 · 1 0

You're oversimplifying the situation and in case you haven't realized it, Clinton hasn't been in office for 6 years now.

The U.S. tried invading Iraq and we all know how that turned out. Imposing harsh sanctions on North Korea are necessary but will have undesirable results. The regime, which is already desperately in need of funds, will collapse and become even more unstable than it already is.

2006-10-13 16:35:31 · answer #5 · answered by Habester 3 · 2 2

Didn,t the World try to Reason with America before we made the STUPID mistake of invading Iraq?

2006-10-13 16:36:46 · answer #6 · answered by dstr 6 · 1 0

Iran has its own idea of peace
everyone be Moslem
it is simple to understand

2006-10-13 16:34:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

No war is worth starting.
Any and every possible way to avoid it must be explored.
And when everything fails, you still have to let the bad guy strike first. Because if you don't wait, you are starting a war and sentencing a lot of people to die, and maybe it never needed to happen.
Do you think your own soldiers aren't people with lives to live?

2006-10-13 16:32:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Countries and people are all the same. There are people who can't be reasoned with. We call them Liberals or Democrats and others call them sociopaths or socialist.

2006-10-13 16:31:07 · answer #9 · answered by Eldude 6 · 1 1

The most unreasonable country of all, The United States of America. It is populated by an increasing number of jingoists and the world need fear their dogma now more than ever!

2006-10-13 16:30:32 · answer #10 · answered by joe 2 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers