2006-10-13 16:27:25 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
prokaryotes - eukaryotes - choanoflagellates - sponges - jellyfish like things - flatworms - hemichordate worms - chordate worms - jawless/boneless fish - placoderms (fish with plate armour) - lobe-finned fish - freshwater tetrapods (4 limbs) - primitive amphibians - primitive reptiles - therapsids (mammal like reptiles) - mammals (small insect eaters) - placental mammals.....
actually there's a good summary here:
2006-10-15 04:53:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is a complex question. I do believe strongly in evolution and find it hard to believe others don't see it everyday. Darwin maybe has some flawed beliefs, but the idea is very genuine. As for the question at hand, I would simply get a zoology book. Look at the order they put them in throughout simple instructional books like that. That will tell you the simple order, though it is MUCH more complex then that.
2006-10-13 18:13:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
evolution is a fact-yet within each kind-the dna of a one cell ameoba cant be changed to make it anything else even in a labratory-yet with proper feeding or inproper and light and other variables it can be made better or worse-and only the strong survive. David in your blog-with John chapter 3 and a word for Rovin from him to me to you-listen its the truth!
2006-10-14 20:52:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no direct line, that's a misconception. Evolution is a random process at times occurring in great leaps. Read some more.
2006-10-13 16:29:32 · answer #4 · answered by joe 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Big subject. As has been said, " line " is a mis- conceptualization. Start at Taxonomy; wikipedia.
2006-10-13 16:42:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it is single cell organism to multi cell organisms to ocean animals to reptiles to dinosause. From dinosaurs it branches off. You have fish and birds and mamals. In mamals you get to primates then up-right primates to cave men to neaderthals to cro-magadons (I think thats what they were) to humans but PLEASE don't take my word from it. This is all a gues.
2006-10-13 16:39:49 · answer #6 · answered by Futureguy51 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Darwinism is bs. His grandfather had already developed the theory and his inbred royal family was just a tool for the Elite, to spread this notion that we are merely evolved goop. This is important to strip humankind of its own knowledge of our eternal nature, something ancient societies knew to well, thus disempowering the masses..It is ridiculous, there are numerous texts, (not creationist) that detail his flawed logic. Not to discount the notion of survival of the fittest betting adaptation that of course is observable in nature. Also modern man has been proven to be much older than commonly preceived, millions of years old not 100-150k like we are taught :)
2006-10-13 16:34:37 · answer #7 · answered by David . 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I think my ancestors were dogs. But that would be a bit flattering. Humans suck.
2006-10-13 16:36:58 · answer #8 · answered by Tuna-San 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a complete lie man was created by GOD!!! darwins theory of evolution is flawed in so many ways it is uncomprehensible! read the bible
2006-10-13 16:30:58 · answer #9 · answered by James S 2 · 0⤊ 6⤋