If you think he will, please give reasons why.
If you don't think he will, please give reasons why not.
2006-10-13 14:37:04 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Name one thing the guy has done that is even close to peaceful? He's indirectly responsible for the deaths of over 600,000 Iraqi civilians. He's invaded two countries and is close to invading his 3rd and he might invade more. Now the invasion of Afghanistan was absolutely necessary but it's still war and when you wage war you don't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter how much good it may or may not (Iraq) have done.
2006-10-13 14:45:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's me again!!!
Look at the facts, whats the deficit compared to two years ago? We have more FULL time jobs than the Clinton admin had during the dot.com boom. I DO suggest a great read though....you will like it and learn alot about things over in Iraq, Now, and then.
Have a nice day
The insurgency is going to be pumped up due to November elections in a vain attempt to try and get American support against the war. But we can see whats happening daily. The insurgency, however, is aimed mainly at innocent people, like today, with the kidnapping of teenagers, and children, and killing of innocent people trying to run a press station>>> (of ALL sects of religion within that country-that were killed within this press related killing)-which will only deepen not only the peoples of iraqs resentment at their freedoms, and safety being taken away, remember their Vice president has already lost three siblings-BUT-from VERY good sources, the total of iraqi deaths stands at about 50,000....but still, how? And by whom? The peace that will be given effort at maintaining in Iraq, and building infrastructure and economy will only pick up, enliven, and excite, not only the iraqi people to keep standing up for a MUCH better life than they had under Saddams reign, but also, Iran, we will leave alone (outside of fighting off sent terrorists of the innocent, that they wish to control)-and soon too, it is my belief, and an Irani friend of mines, that the younger irani generation will want the same growth and freedoms that will slowly but surely seep into Iraq.
Also, an extremely good book to find out what is REALLY going on over there, and was, is "See No Evil" by Robert Baer....ex CIA
2006-10-13 14:41:31 · answer #2 · answered by Mojo Jojo 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If He had killed greater suitable of them, that should opt to have been worth a peace prize. killing the enemy does reason peace. I understand that the obama's had a BBQ some days interior the previous. that's time for him to get yet yet another precise deserved nobal peace prize
2016-11-28 04:24:33 · answer #3 · answered by gardy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rolling On the Floor Laughing
2006-10-13 14:43:40 · answer #4 · answered by LeOs 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If Henry Kissinger can get it, why not Bush?! He'd claim that all the killings and exploitation are for peace...there are already enough silly people who'd go along with it!
2006-10-13 15:23:21 · answer #5 · answered by peace m 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. IT would be an oxymoron. He has declared himself a "war time President." That is a mission totally unrelated to peace.
2006-10-13 15:28:15 · answer #6 · answered by Cub6265 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, because he brought peace to the Middle East.
2006-10-13 14:40:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hello? He started a pre-emptive war that no one else in the world thought was just.
2006-10-13 14:39:26 · answer #8 · answered by tarro 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Anything's possible. They gave on to Henry Kissinger, didn't they? Same ilk.
2006-10-13 14:42:08 · answer #9 · answered by The Gadfly 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No way. that's for true peace bringers, like Yasser Arafat.
2006-10-13 14:40:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋