I traded Hank Baskett and Matt stover for Reggie Brown and Michael Turner.
Your thoughts?
2006-10-13 14:12:41 · 4 answers · asked by -Incline- 4 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
well, i would say that you got the better end of the deal simply because you don't really know what you're going to get out of Hank Baskett on a weekly basis. I think you should've held on to Matt Stover because he's one of the best kickers in the NFL. The problem with Mike Turner is that he's behind LT, and while he might provide a good change of pace...this is a must win week for the Chargers, and that means LT will be the work horse...so Turner may not get the opportunities. I'm not too high on Ronnie Brown...but maybe Joey Harrington can get him the ball more often to get him going to open up the passing game.
I just had to drop Chris Chambers cause he's simply not producing points, and I needed someone better suited to help me win.
Good luck to you...not a bad trade.
2006-10-13 14:32:12 · answer #1 · answered by Kizeman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kicker as a trade . Thats a rarity. Don't really care much about kickers. Most of the league didnt even draft Robbie Gould. Hank Baskett is not even worthy of a roster spot. He gets ball thrown at him 5times max a game. Thats when stallworth is out. Reggie Brown looks like the only one worth a roster spot in that trade besides the kicker. So I think You got the better deal. Hopefully you have another good kicker though.
2006-10-13 21:54:48 · answer #2 · answered by B E 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Baskett was a flash in the pan since philly is doing this receiving by committee thing.
2006-10-13 21:38:19 · answer #3 · answered by alwaysmoose 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a decent trade for this season, especially towards the 2nd half of the season and/or playoffs.
If you are in a keeper league, then it's a great trade.
2006-10-13 21:20:56 · answer #4 · answered by justdennis 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋