English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-13 13:49:17 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Biology

12 answers

I believe so. This is an interesting topic I've given alot of thought to. Do you ever notice how much more beautiful people of mixed races are? As my mom once said, if thats not God trying to tell us something, what is? Also, if you look at the animal kingdom, mixed breeds and species create genetically superior offspring. It is a phenomenon called "hybrid vigour". For instance the Liger is a cross between a lion and tiger but are much larger and more intelligent than either parent. The most intelligent breed of dog is a "Golden-doodle", a cross between a retriever and a poodle. Nature proves that mixing is a good thing. Hitler was way off.

2006-10-13 13:50:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not at the individual level.
At the group level the population of racially mixed people can be expected to include some people with the best traits of each race, which would lend a survivability edge to the group.
A larger gene pool is always more robust than a small one.

Some examples are; the gene that confers a resistence to HIV in the European population is a 'broken' gene that allow West Nile to become a killer. Or a gene that gives resistance to malaria but also contributes to sickle-cell anemia.

2006-10-13 13:57:43 · answer #2 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 0 0

each mixed individual seems diverse. yet specific, i've got seen various mixed people who're eye-catching. some won't be as lovable as others. yet all of it quite is to declare that every person races have fairly human beings and unsightly human beings, too.

2016-10-19 08:48:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I woudn't say 'better' but the mix provides a better environment for stronger genes. Everyone in my family is mixed-race, and we hardly ever get sick, had no childhood dieseases, and live long - 90 years +. And we're mixed from all over the world map.

2006-10-13 13:53:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

yes. i think we should have interatial relationships and marriages for 2 reasons
1) to end all of this race related hate
2) to end alot of illneses that are race related. for example anglo saxons are prone to cystic fibrosis(my wife ,son and i are all carriers of cf) I can't remember the name of the diesease but there is one that is strictly african.
not ony health reasons either i belive a mixed race child will be stronger ,faster,smarter and so on. many people here mentioned animal mixes that are superior,i would like to add one more the wolf hybrid. they are smaller than pure wolves due to the fact malmutes,siberian huskies and german shepards are smaller. but as a hybrid their health is far better,more loving,less likely to turn on you, and far superior than any singl or even mixed breeds i know of.
i had 2 and they would stick their noses between their paws and prey before eating(i taught them that and it wasn't hard at all) they also learned the propert lines and was very protective of the enitre family and group of freinds that came around.

they do the same with plants as well, i can't remember the name of the man but he had studied peas and how to cross them

i can name a few famous people that are mixed and very pretty.

shakira-columbian-arabian(i think)
halle berry i know she is part african american but cant remember if she is also white or native american or both.
mariah carrey _ african american and caucasion.

slash from guns and roses(when his hair is back and you can see his face lol) is african /white
that was the only male i know of.
but look at their tallents and their cultures.

2006-10-13 15:57:47 · answer #5 · answered by cuervo25_1 3 · 0 0

Quite possibly, as better genetics is what sexual reproduction is all about, and the farther apart the genes, the more different they are.

They are certainly some of the most attractive people on this planet.

2006-10-13 13:52:06 · answer #6 · answered by finaldx 7 · 0 0

Interesting question. We are rather close, genetically, but I assume some regional variance could be called " superior " A heterozygous advantage conferred by a sickle cell bearer mating with non- bearer?

2006-10-13 13:54:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes Indeed. They have a wider gene pool and less chance of having genetic diseases. Also, the chances of the survival are higher because wider gene pool allows them to be more adaptable to various kind of environments, increased chance of biological fitness and decreased chance of extinction.

2006-10-13 13:59:24 · answer #8 · answered by SIMSUM 1 · 0 0

It depends on what they're mixed with!! There's a lot of good and bad mixes.....

2006-10-13 13:51:31 · answer #9 · answered by bezsenný 5 · 0 0

I think they do. Diversity in DNA make the human race stronger

2006-10-13 13:51:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers