Its so funny that you never hear about this from the bias liberal media...this is why you people aren't taken seriously, and even though Bush is not that great his party is still proposing much better ideas than your loony ones. Oh wait what ideas do you people have? Other than bashing Bush?
Hypocrits on war?
Democrats' Pre- War Quotes
Keep in mind that Congress can receive the same intelligence that the president gets. They have just as high security clearance. They also get briefed by the CIA director just like the President.
Chuck Schumer > October 10, 2002
"It is Hussein's vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons, and his present and future potential support for terrorist acts and organizations that make him a danger to the people of the united states."
Bill Clinton > February 17, 1998 "If Saddam rejects peace, and we have to use force, our purpose is clear: We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program
2006-10-13 13:21:52 · 9 answers · asked by Murfdigidy 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Madeleine Albright > February 1, 1998 "We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and the security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
Nancy Pelosi > December 16, 1998 "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Ted Kennedy > September 27, 2002 "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Jay Rockefeller > October 10, 2002 "There was unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. We also should remember that we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
2006-10-13 13:22:07 · update #1
They have a very convenient lapse of memory. and nasty attitudes!
2006-10-13 13:28:51 · answer #1 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Based on the intelligence we had - from all of the allied countries involved in the gathering of the information, I, too, would have voted to invade Iraq, pre-emptively.
It is so hypocritical to sit back and preach about all of the mistakes and misinformation - with the luxury of hindsight - when you consider that if we had done nothing - and the intelligence had been correct, the terrorists in Afghanistan and Iraq would invariably have acquired nuclear weapons. It seems quite obvious to me that following 9/11 - we had no option but to assure that this didn't happen.
I can only suspect that the Liberals today are prepared and willing to convert to Islam. It will be their only option if we concede victory to the terrorists. The Islamic radicals' demand is quite clear:
Convert to Islam.......or die.
2006-10-13 13:49:27 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
OK that was way too long. Listen buddy it sounds like you have some real issues with liberals. It's OK to stand up for what you beleive in, but there is also a stopping point before someone decides to get a virtual EPO on you. Why are you so curious about liberals if you beleive in nothing that they stand for? You thinking about switching over or you just need someone to bash the crap out of. Give em' a break.
2006-10-17 06:28:48 · answer #3 · answered by summer love 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
so... this is your whole arguement... becaue we believed that Saddam had WMD on faulty intelligence we're doomed to forever be branded fools?
that's a bit oversimplistic... don't you think?
what was bush's last good idea? I don't remember one?
thanks for the 1000th time these quotes have been posted... I would go post all the "you can support the troops and not the war" quotes from the Republicans under Clinton that shows they are a bunch of hypocrits too.. but they've been posted a billion times too... so what's the point
2006-10-13 13:30:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
You need to learn the English language. You need to learn how to use spell check and need to learn the rules of grammar. Then you might be able to communicate with the liberals because, well, we are smarter than you.
2006-10-13 13:30:16 · answer #5 · answered by commonsense 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The real issue for me is which candidates voted for the invasion of Iraq..Kennedy did NOT...so he came to his senses...I do not support any candidate regardless of their party who voted for the Iraq war...this is my integrity when it comes to Principal over politics...what are yours?
Do you support the LIE in Iraq?
2006-10-13 13:30:14 · answer #6 · answered by dstr 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
But you see we are not dealing with a brilliant President here!
http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y263/yesyeslordamen/Jokes/bushwhacked.jpg
2006-10-13 13:32:49 · answer #7 · answered by ₦âħí»€G 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
When pigs fly.
2006-10-13 13:40:13 · answer #8 · answered by Ah Ha 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A liberal and facts....Two words that don't make any sense
2006-10-13 13:24:44 · answer #9 · answered by John 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋