If one isn't going to accept criticism of person B because the debate is about person A, isn't it a matter of fairness that he should tolerate the eventual expression of the criticism of person B, and not solely as a matter of present relevance to him?
2006-10-13 12:35:00 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
One would think so but alas that just isn't the way the world works. Today people Like to only see or hear one side of the story the one that they present not both sides.
scary eh?
2006-10-13 13:42:02 · answer #1 · answered by no 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some people want to criticize person B to deflect attention from person A. In other words to distract and derail the debate because it is not going the way they think it should (their way).
2006-10-13 21:08:52 · answer #2 · answered by The Gadfly 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The answer is of course, "Only if he wants to".
2006-10-13 19:48:47 · answer #3 · answered by Social Science Lady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Huh?
2006-10-13 19:37:09 · answer #4 · answered by peachy78 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
because neither can play the piano.
2006-10-13 20:13:03 · answer #5 · answered by Rico Toasterman JPA 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋