What is your input on Madonna and her newly adopted baby from Africa?

Question

Don't get me wrong, i have nothing against adoption. I was adopted. But, what do you feel about this latest news of Madonna adopting a child from Africa? Coincidence, does this come as a surprise that it is now popular to adopte children out of Africa? Are we going to see similiar celebrity's jump on the adopted bandwagon? There are plenty of children to be adopted here in the US, why not here?

Answer 1

I think she wants to help the child but is it a coincidence that b'cause Jolie and Pitt have adopted kids and they had all the spotlight on them that maybe Madonna wants the same? She's getting old now and not as popular as before so maybe she wants to feel young and useful again and by adopting this needy child, is her way of contributing somehow. I just hope she realizes that this is a human being and not some latest "trend" to satisfy her want for the time being. More than likely she will have a nanny for the child so she can continue just being Madonna.
~My opinion~

Answer 2

Why should she not adopt a child from Africa (Malawi, specifically)? She can provide this boy with an excellent education and a loving home. Contrast his life in the US with that he would live in Africa.

Adopting a child from the US is probably more difficult, too. Parents need to be screened and scrutinized etc. The Africans literally gave Madonna the baby after 3 days.
I am happy for Madonna and her son :-)

Answer 3

She is a very sick perverted person. She should be hung. We need to have (birth) our own children and or care for our own kind that need our care. Nigglets are not worth lifting a finger for unless you want to feed them live to sharks and gators or lions for entertainment or use them for hanging games or medical experiments or put them in zoo's for real children to enjoy.

The White race has not been at replacement ( in other words dying out or committing racial suicide by definition) as in more folks dying than being born - since 1965. We were 32% of the world population in 1900 and are only 12% today with the UN predicting us to be at 3/10ths of 1% by 2100 and extinct by 2200.

Yet we have been subsidizing the non-White population explosion for over a century via trade and aid. Christ insanity organazations and the White ZOG governments are able to keep populations rising for even stone age negroids in Sub-Sahara "Black" Africa. Despite the diseases and wars and starvation they are kept alive long enough to have a huge litter of nigglets. Most of them die young but enough survive to keep the populations exploding in every African nation.

So stop hoping AIDS and other sicknesses and starvation will eliminate them. Sure if ALL White nations had their ZOG governments overthrown and we took control of our own destiny and racially cleansed our nations and destroyed christ insanity - we could end all trade and aid to non-White (mud) peoples. 2 billion of them would die off in short order with another 2 billion within a few years.

Oh the planet would be less polluted and the evironment much better off. The mud people would return to their small near starvation sustainable stone age population sizes, like they were at before our help.

Oh what a brighter Whiter world we could have. However as our nations darken so does our future. If you want a brighter world and future it takes a Whiter world and future.

1488 Rahowa


http://www.amren.com/color.pdf#search='color%20of%20crime'
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/williams081899.asp
http://www.amren.com
http://www.amren.com/antiwht.htm
http://www.newnation.org/nnn-dark-crime.html
http://www.newnation.org/nnn-black-on-white.html
http://www.newnation.org
http://tightrope.cc/rap.htm
http://www.drdsk.com/articles.html
http://www.solargeneral.com
http://www.resist.com
http://www.rahowa.com
http://www.overthrow.com/creator/wmb/wmb.asp
http://www.overthrow.com/creator/ner/ner.asp
http://www.rahowa.net
http://www.wcote.org
http://www.natall.com
http://www.nationalvanguard.com
http://www.resistance.com
http://www.whiterevolution.com
http://www.stormfront.org
http://www.solargeneral.com/library/humor.php
http://www.niggermania.com
http://naturalhygienesociety.org
http://www.rawfood.com/nfl.html
http://www.rawfood.com

Answer 4

These celebrities are not adopting children. They are buying slaves.

Also, look at the other celebrities who are adopting or interested in adopting. Angelina? Jessica Simpson? They are not exactly great role models.

Do adoption agencies allow adulterers to adopt kids?

Answer 5

I so agree with you on that. I think it's good that they find it in there hearts to raise a child that's not theirs. But it seems like some of these celebs are collecting these kids like tokens and trophies for example, Angelina Jolie. She said the she was going to get a child from "every continent." Why didn't she start right herein the US? I think shes trying to gain back a good rep.

Answer 6

I think she just wants attention! she could have adopted a million babies a long *** time ago, she is a wannabe angelina jolie...... she is just looking for a way to stay in the spotlight

Answer 7

Maybe because the kids in Africa have it far worse than anyone in the US.

Answer 8

I think his skin color will clash with most of her outfits during this retro-70's look she's got going on now.

She should have gone for a kid with more of a brown complexion.

Answer 9

properly, i think of that greater human beings must be accompanied yet enable's talk darfur first becuase that section is in simple terms too fuc*ed up and that i think of that somebody ought to attempt and help the youngsters of that section first till now you think of with regard to something of africa because of fact sudan is in simple terms the worst place to be in Africa superb now

Answer 10

A good and charitable act is a good and charitable act wherever it occurs.

Even if it's a cheep ho do the act.