Some people get so angry about her politcal views. Why? She is so "off the planet" it is pitiful. Personally, I think something has happened in her personal life that has made her bitter and twisted. We should encourage her to seek professional help instead of demonise her.
2006-10-13 11:27:49 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
No one demonizes Ann Coulter but herself. Ann is very shrewd. Some may perceive such shrewdness as being "off the wall" but in reality, Ann knows that the more "off the wall" books she writes or the more "off the wall" comments she makes on Fox 5, the more people will talk about her.
Ann Coulter is old news and she should remain there.
(Added note: I first heard about Coulter about a year ago. I watched and heard her on Fox 5 for about a hot 3 minutes, turned HER off and never watched her again. That is how you react to something that you find distasteful. Ignore it...or in this case....ignore her.)
and by the way, Coulter really isn't pretty. It is her MAKEUP that is pretty. Also she is not blonde. She's bottle blonde. And below the belt, is as phony as she is.
(No, not a Democrat.)
2006-10-13 11:36:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because of the pathetic know-nothing people that are influenced by her.
She is like a contagion of ignorance and malice.
Intelligent people can laugh at her, but for every one who does, some other dunce is taking her word for how things were in the past and how they should be now.
The media companies that fired her in the past knew what they were doing.
2006-10-13 11:34:26 · answer #2 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you have come up with a pretty good analysis of Ann Coulter. I don't get angry...I simply don't care to watch her or listen to her views. She sounds as if she has a real chip on her shoulder.
2006-10-13 11:30:11 · answer #3 · answered by Jo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She could come off that thank you to those who have not actual examine her artwork or listened to her, just to the few screaming headlines or "rates" they positioned up on blogs. The 9/11 widows she become speaking approximately have been a small group who used their victimhood to earnings political traction and the media spotlight and acted like they have been speaking for all people who lost human beings in 9/11. lots of people who lost human beings on 9/11 vehemently disagreed with them, however the liberal media had began treating them like they have been the Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton of the 9/11 victims. and that they used their new repute to push a liberal political diatribe against Bush. She makes use of the outlandish "headline" declare to get human beings to envision her commonly logical opinion. sometimes she is going over the final and pushes a satirical screed too some distance for the ingredient she is attempting to make. yet i come across your description of her to be greater consistent with 2d-hand information than on having taken the time to envision and hear her to work out what become in the back of the "outrageous" statements.
2016-11-28 04:12:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My school wasted 24,000 dollars in a speaker fee for her to come to our school. There were more people out protesting her speaking then actually in the auditorium. It was a big mess. She ended up calling all the males in the audience gay and walking off of stage. HUGE waste of my student activity fee.
2006-10-13 12:35:30 · answer #5 · answered by danihod 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The reason something needs to be done about Coulter and those like her is not really what she says, in and of itself, its that there are many people who actually listen to her and those like her (*CfOaUuGHx CnOeUwGHs*).
2006-10-13 11:44:36 · answer #6 · answered by John J 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're entitled to your opinion, and a lot of people don't agree with you. I think she's a fox and I like her point of view, even if it's slightly right of my own. That doesn't make her a bad person.
2006-10-13 11:31:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree with you. But I don't think it's pathological - I think it's all planned. It's her schtick - her character. She's just trying to get a rise out of people. She's just a vile, pathetic woman.
2006-10-13 11:29:52 · answer #8 · answered by Kat 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather see her on her knees doing the one thing with her mouth that wouldnt offend anyone.She is a stupid whore that normal thinking people should ignore.
2006-10-13 11:32:04 · answer #9 · answered by thatdamngood04 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. She is hotter than any of the DNC trolls
2. She is smarter than all the DNC trolls
3. She must be telling some big truth for the liberals to be wetting themselves over what she says.
2006-10-13 12:09:40 · answer #10 · answered by Have gun, will travel. 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋