Who agrees that the electoral college should be abolished and is ludicrous?

Question

that is my opinoin.

it is more fair if sheer number of votes are counted.

Answer 1

I agree. It's time to go to election by popular vote. If we had done that years ago, we'd be spared the current debacle in Washington now and Al Gore would be wrapping up his second term....bin Laden would be captured, the environment would be in better shape.....hell, we'd all be in better shape. But, thanks to the antiquated Electoral College we got Dumb, Dumber and Dumbest (you can figure out which is which).

Answer 2

The federal government was created by the States, not the People. The President is the President of the united States, not of the People of the united States. The States get to choose who is President, through the Electoral College. The fact is that his job under the Constitution has nothing whatsoever to do with us.

The individual citizen does not have a right to vote for the office of President, unless it is granted by their State. You have no Constitutional right to vote for the President. None. Zip. Nil. Nada.

Your right to vote for the President is exactly what your State constitution creates, no more and no less. As the USSC noted in Bush v. Gore, if a State did not give the people of a state a vote in Presidential elections, the federal government, including themselves, would be powerless to force them to.

The Electoral College still serves the same purpose today that it did 230 years ago, and that is to protect the Constition from a mass of people that haven't bothered to read it.

Answer 3

I understand there is corruption in politics yet to attitude it out of your perspective, the theory that the electoral college helps from now on bribing or enables extra corruption is only fake. the rationalization the electoral college is in place is to aim to stability the flexibility of the individuals-- to furnish smaller states extra equivalent say to extra beneficial ones. i do no longer understand if it may very well be abolished... such as you pronounced, Obama did get the favored vote, proving the favored vote isn't continually the best. all of us is too somewhat swept away by way of dramatics and can get caught up in spirit of issues without thinking for themselves.

Answer 4

How many would still feel that way if 2000 had gone the other way, with Gore winning the electoral vote and Bush the popular?

Answer 5

If it were abolished, then only 5 states would get the attention of presidential candidates: California, Ohio, Florida, New York, Illinois.

Answer 6

I do. It was established to ensure fair elections back when there was inadequate communication for the electorate to accurately know about a particular presidential candidate. Has no value or use today, other than to skew e;ection outcomes by ignoring voters in entire states.

Answer 7

I'm not sure that it needs to be abolished so much as re-tooled. I understand the principle behind it but it doesn't seem to fit the mandate of the general population quite so much. I think re-tooling is the way to go. Not abolition.

Answer 8

I do, it should be by popular vote, That's it!!! we are a democracy, every other election is won by popular vote. The reason that it was created do not apply any longer. I do not understand why we still need it.

Answer 9

yes i agree with you . they really have just took away our rights to vote with this electoral college mess

Answer 10

I don't think it should be. I think people from smaller states would be less represented that way.