2006-10-13 09:52:03 · 8 answers · asked by gokoglan 1 in Sports ➔ Swimming & Diving
Pugle Mania is somewhat correct. Only somewhat because that record is for scuba and it wasn't using air. The record breaker used a combination of Trimix and and a pony bottle of O2. No "regular air" was used. For those who are wondering what is meant by "no protection" in this answer, the questioner is referring to what's called a hard suit. They use normal air at 1 atm.
2006-10-13 11:51:41 · answer #1 · answered by scubabob 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
nicely it relies upon on how long they are able to hold their breath. or maybe if in the event that they could carry it for a ridiculously long term they could finally get overwhelmed by utilising the rigidity. although, maximum human beings could never make it as much as now. i could say 20m or so with adequate time again lower back up.
2016-11-28 04:05:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The record has been broken many times, but as of 2005 it was 1044.12 Feet.
2006-10-13 10:03:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
See an article on Wired http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.12/dive.html on the issue. According to the article only two people made down to 558 feet
2006-10-13 10:01:04 · answer #4 · answered by blapath 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
3000 ft above the ground
2006-10-13 10:03:38 · answer #5 · answered by vick 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
hhhhhmmmmmmmm.......i dont really know because what sort of protection do you mean???
2006-10-13 09:54:41 · answer #6 · answered by iSwim4ever 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who knows, I don't care.
2006-10-15 11:44:13 · answer #7 · answered by Stephen X 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
what kind of diving?? muff?
2006-10-13 09:56:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋