Wouldnt it be easier to list the things libs arent blaming him for?
2006-10-13 09:01:24 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Hmmmn, I can think of anything he is NOT being blamed for!
2006-10-13 09:02:53 · answer #1 · answered by Rags to Riches 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hahaha, I like the previous answer which says "christian fanatic." I mean, obviously there's no such thing as a liberal christian. (sarcasm, children, sarcasm).
They need someone to blame, and honestly, Bush has screwed up. A lot. I mean, I'm conservative, but heck, voting for Bush was just the lesser evil. He's rather incompetent and royally goofed on the border issue (not to mention this little problem called Iraq...), and all in all, I'm glad our presidents are limited to two terms.
But he WAS re-elected. Which says something about America; we're not ready for a liberal president.
And to be quite honest, if Hillary Clinton ever becomes president, I'm moving to Iceland the next day.
2006-10-13 09:14:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm a conservative republican and that i do admit he wasn't continuously the final president for example: I thoroughly yet respecfully disagree along with his desicion to enforce the $seven-hundred billion greenback bailout. on the different hand Obama techniques are insane, his socialistic rules could no longer be worse for the economy perfect now. The redistribution of wealth would not provide any incentive to get forward in this international because of the fact in case you do artwork no longer uncomplicated your money will in all probability be sent to 3 crackhead thats to lazy to get off his butt and get a activity. Obamas gun administration rules will make it almost impossible to get a gun anymore, meaning that the only people who could have them are criminals. I plan on transforming into a member of the U. S. AIr tension as an Officer, he has incredibly no concept approximately a thank you to function the armed centers and that i FREAKS THE HECK OUT OF ME! Why do no longer democrats nicely known that Obama became the extra severe decision for president. Why will no longer be able to you face certainty?
2016-12-13 07:44:14 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have a book that tells all he has dne for his rich friends & against the 'little' people in this country...they haven't even scratched the surface on here...and I have actually stood up for stuff that they say he did that he didn't actually do.
He has done plenty of bad stuff & the repubs will blame the dems no matter what happens anyway, so what does it matter....
2006-10-13 09:12:11 · answer #4 · answered by fairly smart 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
His fellow Republicans are already compiling and publicizing both lists quite nicely. Some of them you may want to dismiss as closet liberals, of course. But I can see your point - showing the one or two disasters he is not responsible for might serve to emphasize that the "blame" we are ascribing to him is well documented and well deserved.
2006-10-13 09:12:52 · answer #5 · answered by Grist 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I haven't yet heard them blame Bush for the scandal that's starting to surround that rat Harry Reid, but I'm certain even that will get laid at his doorstep in due time.
2006-10-13 09:09:59 · answer #6 · answered by Wayne H 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Somebody's got to be the scape goat. It's easier to say it's Bush's fault and I feel bad for the guy- we have a whole Congress that jacks stuff up and we live in a system of checks and balances, so don't tell me it's HIS fault for everything. Of course it's easier to blame him--those hurricanes, of course he made those rise from the winds, and the hole in the ozone he probably put there too. The truth is, Americans are the first to tell someone they need to accept responsibility but as individuals, we're the worst at actually taking blame for our actions. Just wait, the next president will get it just as bad.
2006-10-13 09:06:53 · answer #7 · answered by Abcdefg 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
He is the appointed president, the buck does stop there. Sorry but if he wasn't the president you would be blaming Al Gore for everything I am sure. Your party is still blaming Bill Clinton for everything when you can't point your finger at anything but Bush. Maybe if you were a true American you could see what a mess he is making of this country.
2006-10-13 09:07:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Sorry, that position is being taken by all the things the cons are blaming Clinton for.
Still
2006-10-13 09:08:04 · answer #9 · answered by justa 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
That would be a lot easier. Unfortunately, I can't think of anything the Dem's haven't blamed G.W.B. for. LOL
2006-10-13 09:03:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋