This one is a little tricky. We can see galaxies out to about 13 billion light years and we can assume that these contain stars - but we cannot resolve the individual stars within the galaxies. We can resolve individual stars in a galaxy out to a far distance (mega parsecs) but at this distance almost all these stars can be considered at the same distance - so we can't really say which is the furthest NAMED star.
2006-10-13 08:29:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mark G 7
·
7⤊
0⤋
Because they are finding new stars almost every day then the name given today will be wrong this time tomorrow and all newly discovered stars are given a catalogue number first and unless they are special in some way they will probably never have a name
2006-10-17 03:06:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by xpatgary 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are galaxies we know of, at about 8 billion light years distant from us -but we are unable to resolve individual stars.
However, any known stars at this distance will only have catalogue numbers, not proper names.
2006-10-14 10:45:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Andrew W 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
farthest not furthest. Probably 8 billion light years. Hubble can give answer.
2006-10-13 14:11:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by rwbblb46 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Super-far star
2006-10-13 08:08:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
BE-1....Bob Enzyte 1
2006-10-13 09:43:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is weird but there are more than one furthest stars .....
2006-10-13 08:12:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by gjmb1960 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It doesn't seem to have a name but this is the only thing I can find!!!
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/980329a.html
2006-10-13 08:10:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
paris hilton
2006-10-13 12:56:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by breastfed43 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I call it Fred.
But, that's just me.
2006-10-13 08:09:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dave 4
·
0⤊
2⤋