English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

Umm, tell me how it affects you. That's foolishness.



Libs keep striking out. They are the ones who like us to live on their handouts. I'll take a job and the ability to pay my own way over hand outs anytime. DEMS....keep your welfare. I'll spend my own money, thank you.

2006-10-13 08:12:30 · answer #1 · answered by thomasnotdoubting2 3 · 1 1

Deficit is 2% of GDP, which is lower than the average over the past forty years.

When talking about debt, you need perspective. Is $100,000 a lot of debt for me? Yes. For you? Probably. For Bill Gates? Nope, he wins or loses that hundreds of times a day just in the change in Microsoft stock.

Same with the US Government. Debt is relative to income. US income is higher than it ever has been. The tax cuts that were put through after 9/11 are probably the most effective policy the Administration has done (I'm not a big fan of Bush, but I give him credit on this one.)

Don't forget to be fair - Democrats generally are more aggressive about spending money than Republicans. And social welfare programs are much more difficult to justify, as there is significant evidence that the welfare state harms the standard of living for the poor.

2006-10-13 08:16:12 · answer #2 · answered by Polymath 5 · 0 1

i'm for stem cellular study. Bush would not opt for to pay for embroynic stem cellular study with federal funds. the priority is a exceptional form of researchers have been given investment funds for study and their shareholders opt for a return. subsequently some distance, there has been no return because of the fact embryonic stem cellular transplants consistently look to reason maximum cancers, a bad little ingredient result. think of of it, embryonic cells are programmed to bypass from 2 cells to a 9 pound mass in 9 months. So once you place them interior the physique to assert regenerate the middle, they start up becoming to be a 9 pound mass of hair bone etc and that's deadly. for the reason that investors have become sensible to the priority, researchers opt for federal funds the place return on investment isn't an argument. possibly that's stable, possibly not, even though it could improve the nationwide debt.

2016-11-28 03:58:02 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It was raining bullsh*t and the morons praised the Idiot King just because they can never admit they are wrong. Of course when their children are living in a third world country they will all deny they ever voted for the Bush Leaguers. Lying comes so easily to them because there is no reality in Bush World.

2006-10-13 08:38:36 · answer #4 · answered by Thomas S 4 · 0 0

hmm you do realize that bush's debt will affect for years too come, so also the current national debt is being affected from presidents during your grandparent's time yes? the actions of presidents and congressmen and women from all that time ago is still having effects on us today. It is called economics, learn it it may be important if you ever care too have any idea what you are talking about it may help too know on the subject

2006-10-13 08:09:17 · answer #5 · answered by brotherwolf 2 · 3 1

That debt caused by Bush may save the lives of our children and grandchildren.

Money well spent.

2006-10-13 08:08:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

What bothers me is the debt we incur paying for illegal aliens, welfare slackers, and pork projects. Those are the big ticket items.

2006-10-13 09:13:12 · answer #7 · answered by MelBright 4 · 0 0

I am NOT a Bush supporter & I am incredibly concerned. They aren't because they are very happy if they are rich & if they are poor, to stoopid to realize the mess he has made because they believe what he tells them!

2006-10-13 08:16:24 · answer #8 · answered by fairly smart 7 · 0 1

There was debt long before Bush.

2006-10-13 08:09:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Not as much as it would bother me if the USA was over-run by the muslims and my children and gandchildren had to live under their control.

2006-10-13 08:11:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers