Should violent juveniles be trialed as adults?

Question

okay lets switch it up a little. Let's take the factor of age out. Juvenile = any person under the age of 17. Then, sholud they be trialed as adults, yes or no.

okay lets switch it up a little. Let's take the factor of age out. Juvenile= any person under the age of 17. Then, should they be trialed as adults, yes or no.

okay lets switch it up a little. Let's take the factor of age out. Juvenile is any person under the age of 17. Then, should they be trialed as adults, yes or no.

Answer 1

Most definitely. Many adult offenders recruit underage kids to do their dirty work because the juveniles can get off with a slap on the wrists.

In today's world, there is no such thing as youthful innocence. That died decades ago.

If you do the crime, you gotta do the time, no matter if you are a teenager.

Of course, kids under ten should be treated differently.

Answer 2

Well, by the statement of 'violent' I would assume that is was a major crime. I believe that if they consider themselves adults, act like an adult in other areas of their life, i.e. working and quitting school, becoming a parent, no respect for previous authiority - and they had the mindset of an adult when they committed the crime, then yes. They should be tried as an adult. They have taken it upon themselves to be one so far.
In my opinion, a juvenile is someone who doesn't fully understand consequences or the reasons why. They don't know why this is wrong or how that would be a result. But an adult either accepts whatever and knows ahead of time, or just commits whatever act they please without regard to others. There is a difference in the point-of-view and mental maturity and processing, short version.

Answer 3

For me there has to be a little more commonsense. I don't believe part of justice is revenge and if you hold someone who is 13 for the rest of their life, till they die, maybe 70, 80 years old, it sounds more like revenge than justice.

I think the real problem is deciding who is a juvenile. Some kids at 17 have the maturity of a 13 year old and some at 13 have the maturity of someone 17. Bludgeon, sledge hammer justice doesn't seem to be a good answer.

But if it was someone in my family who was harmed I would want the person to be put away forever. That's the dilemma isn't it?

Answer 4

First it should be determined if the person was old enough to understand what they did was wrong. There was a case a number of years ago of an 11 and 13 year old boys shooting up their middle-school class and killing four kids and a teacher. Legally they can only be held until they are 18, whereupon they will be released into society with no permanent record. To me, that is just wrong. Those two boys knew what they were doing, and should have been put away for life. They killed four kids who will never have their own lives realized.

Answer 5

i do no longer think of they must be tried as an person except it become for specific premeditated, intentional, or they only did some quite sick and twisted stuff. Do you undergo in ideas the case lower back around 2001? It become an 11 300 and sixty 5 days previous boy who become left on my own together with his 6 300 and sixty 5 days previous cousin on the same time as the person become dozing. The person become the two his or her mom. They have been ruff housing, the female have been given thrown up against the wall and died at once. He have been given tried as an person and become sentenced to existence in detention center without the prospect of parole! it quite is largely a real sign of ways our device is so screwed up! He ought to have on no account been tried, nor sentenced in my ideas! It become very unlucky, yet it become nevertheless an twist of destiny, that of a splash boy!!!! None the fewer the had a re-trial for him and he have been given out of detention center at sixteen. you understand that screwed that little boy up for something of his existence! The dying on my own become sufficient to clutter together with his head, no longer to show being raised in a detention center! Our total device is screwed! yet another ingredient-do no longer you think of that it quite is tousled how rapist and toddler molesters get like 3-5 years MAX!!!! yet in case you get caught with a small volume of shrooms on you, you may get charged with manslaughter or attempt manslaughter and pass away for something of your existence! the U. S. is something else. i visit declare it.....i'm genuinely no longer happy with being an American!

Answer 6

Go to this link:
Is It Kiddie Crime or Adult Time for Juveniles?
http://www.njsbf.com/njsbf/student/eagle/fall01-1.cfm

Answer 7

Yeah, like the 15 year old kid that shot his principal 3 times at point blank...adult. he knows what he did was wrong. If he was 5, not so much.

Answer 8

Depends on the juveniles and the crime committed, their past history etc...

Answer 9

Depends on the offensive! how serious was the crime.murder yes if they are not mentaly ill,and not responsible for there actions.lets pray that this isn't the reason you are asking.

Answer 10

if your like, 15+, then yes
If 14-, then no, they shouldnt be