2006-10-13 07:37:11 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No i think that YOU should invade them by yourself, Georgie! Get yourself a gun and a helmet and go too it. It don't matter which one you pick first, just make sure to tell me when and where so i can make a call and have them ready for you. Its a WINNING situation for the American people and the only waste will be the bullet that takes you out. Maybe then we can get Bill Clinton back in office, he was so sexually satisfied that he did not want to fight people for no reason!!
2006-10-13 07:43:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think NK is really interested in nuking us. So no to them, they just want a bargaining chip for better trade. Iran has all these crazy azz radical Muslims who want to die if they can kill an American doing it. But the only military action I MIGHT support against Iran would be a few strategic air strikes, no invasion. We don't need another Iraq.
But we definitely aren't at that point yet, anyway.
2006-10-13 07:58:11 · answer #2 · answered by jbrowning001 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I think we should sit back and show North Korea what a REAL nuclear test looks like.
2006-10-13 07:42:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, when did one country think it was so much better than everyone else it decided to tell everyone else what to do.
Leave everybody alone! Like Dr. Phil says: "You went into North Korea, my oldest brother faught in that war. You lost!
Then USA went into Viet Nam my youngest brother died in that war. I know what it feels like to lose a loved one to war. You lost!
You went to Iraq, "HOw's that working for you?"
Why don't you just stay home and leave everyone alone.
2006-10-13 07:50:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
With what Army? Aren't they all just a little busy in Iraq right now?
2006-10-13 08:09:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hopefully, we can handle them with stand off weapons. If not, we will have no choice. Diplomacy has about as much chance as a snowball in hell.
2006-10-17 07:15:45 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not without finding out how every other country feels about it. Especially Uganda and Tibet. I couldn't endorse any such action until we are sure it is OK with the rest of the world.
2006-10-13 07:42:58 · answer #7 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Actually i think we should invade the whole world.
2006-10-13 07:50:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
And how would we do that? We're stretched extremely thin now! And what would be the point? These are political mishaps that will blow over or be better left to the UN to deal with.
2006-10-13 07:41:05 · answer #9 · answered by Shelley 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The answer is simple.
Do nothing until the democrats get in there so they can do nothing, give money to foreign countries, increase welfare benefits, give health insurance to illegal immigrants, raise taxes and then when we get nuked they can just blame the past administration's failure to prevent it.
2006-10-13 07:41:26 · answer #10 · answered by Funnyaccountant 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋