Bill Clinton told the youth of our generation that oral sex is not sex, now kids think thant giving oral sex is okay, because it is not sex. and that it is okay to lie to the american public, (I did not have sexual relations with that woman), cheated on his wife, Should I mention the whitewater scandel, wag the dog, Had Osama in his sights, but...ooops, I missed. Then there are all his mistresses, does Jennifer Flowers ring a bell? So why bash Bush, he is nowhere near as incompent as Clinton.
2006-10-13 06:56:21 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Also, Bill Clinton protested the war in Vietnam, Now, when he gave orders to send our troops to Haiti, how could he do that with a clear conscience? Oh and Somalia?
2006-10-13 07:07:16 · update #1
Ok all you liberals, and Clinton suck ups that say bush has killed many soliders, he has not, the insurgents have, not bush. By the way, what happened when 18 soldiers were killed in Somalia? Clinton pulled out, ran like a chicken.
2006-10-13 08:50:29 · update #2
Who cares about the BJ? I think the biggest stain on the Clinton admin. is giving the N.Koreans nuke tech. What a moron that guy was!
2006-10-13 07:05:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
1. Clinton would have had no reason to offer his views on oral sex if Gingrich and Starr hadn't been probing his sex life. None of their business. 2. He lied to the American public about his sex life which was none of their business. 3. Cheated on his wife which was (all together now) none of our business. 4. You shouldn't mention whitewater because it was a decades old land deal gone bad that (despite the republicans best efforts) was never a scandal. 5. wag the dog...Huh? 6. Never as chummy with the Bin Ladins as the Bushes are. Mistresses: None of our business. How many politicians (including president) do you think haven't had affairs. Gingrich was having an affair while he was out for Clinton's blood. These allegations may point to poor personal judgment on Clinton's part. Not incompetence. Bush's incompetence is undermining our Constitution, human rights, civil rights, Bill of Rights, military strength, middle class...I could go on for pages more but your brain probably hasn't let you read this far.
2006-10-13 07:23:09 · answer #2 · answered by socrates 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
This is amusing. What Clinton did with Lewinski did not get good soldiers killed. What Bush is doing is getting boys killed for no better purpose than war-profittering and saving political face.
Clinton was on the offensive against Bin Laden, but the Republicans became so vocal about "wag the dog" that Clinton lost popular support for attacking Bin Laden. In this way I feel the Republicans were directly responsible for 9/11.
Anyone who now raises "Clinton lied" is doing nothing more than trying to distract people from the real issues: endless and meaningless war, historically high national debt, violations of law and the constitution, the treasonous act of outing a CIA operative during a time of war, thus aiding the enemy, failing to secure our borders and in fact cutting back on resources to first responders,
covering up the immoral activities of a homosexual Republican pedophile, illegal detention of prisoners without legal representation, condoning torture...comparing these things to Clinton's little affair, I think that anyone shouting down Clinton is a glassey-eyed dittohead idiot who really doesn't care that our nation is beling led down a path to destruction, so long as its a Republican pied piper leading us there...
2006-10-13 07:29:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Give me a break!
People all over the World have always thought oral sex was OK. Clinton did not invent cheating on your spouse either.
Now the lies Bush has told the Nation, have done damage.
Yes, Clinton did have Bin Laden in his sites...but oops, the Conservatives started whining and said he wanted to over extend our Military.
By the way, Bush is more incompetent than a flea.
2006-10-13 07:46:20 · answer #4 · answered by MSJP 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
You are attempting a line of ratiocination that libs are incapable of following. They blindly follow the path that their post 60's hippie socialist professors have started them on. The Neo-Bolshevik university system uses the old Marxists tool of "indoctrination".
Makes no difference to a lib that Billary was "studying" at Moscow University while his peers were fighting in South Vietnam, in fact they APPLAUD this as "patriotic".
Billiary lied about sex. This act of deception does not concern me as much as his green-lighting the sale of classified missile technology to the Communist Chinese.
I feel the Republicans made a deal with the (devil) Democrats, and impeached Billary on the lesser of the two offenses.
Why?
Most so-called "republicans" are as dirty as they are fraudulent.
We need real Conservative Leadership.
2006-10-13 08:00:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Kids thought that already, since Bill Clinton was just a kid. As far as lying to the American public, he lied about a PERSONAL matter between he and his wife.
Bush had Osama in his sights at the beginning of the war in Iraq, missed, and still hasn't gotten him in all these years, even knowing that he's in Pakistan. Former FBI Deputy Director John O'Neill wanted to investigate Osama bin Laden and the very same terrorists who were blamed with plotting 9-11, but was prevented from doing so when President Bush signed Presidential Directive W199i, making it a crime to investigate or instigate the terrorists. Resigning his position due to frustration, John O'Neill was given a new career as Director of Security at the Trade Towers in New York City. John O'Neill didn't know that September 11, 2001, coincidentally(?) his first day on the job, would also be the last day of his life. Whatever reasons or suspicions Mr. O'Neill had, died with him that day.
Bush broke international law, and misled Congress when he lied about his reasons for invading and occupying Iraq.
Bush has REPEATEDLY lied about sending our troops into Iraq under a SERIES of false pretenses.
John W. Dean in a Findlaw.com article states, “Rather than veto laws passed by Congress, Bush is using his signing statements to effectively nullify them as they relate to the executive branch. Bush is using signing statements like line item vetoes. Yet the Supreme Court has held the line item vetoes are unconstitutional.” Article One of the Constitution says that bills passed by Congress “shall be presented to the president .... If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his objections.” Nothing there about approving in part and disapproving in part. Bush has basically nullified Congress, and is raping the very Constitution he has sworn to uphold and protect.
Bush has SERIOUSLY lied and misrepresented his intentions with his so-called "War on Terror", and the effects that the Patriot Acts and the Military Commissions Act of 2006 directly have on the American people, virtually annihilating 9 of our 10 rights on our Bill of Rights, by virtually eliminating our guarantee of habeas corpus, and removing any protections WE have against our own government. While we now only have 1 intact right on our Bill of Rights, I suppose the President can take care of that one with a Signing Statement.
Bush showed total disregard for America's laws when he broke 26 of them with his illegal program for spying on American citizens.
In a November of 2005 Oval Office meeting with Republican Congressional, and aide reminded him that provisions in the Patriot Acts undermine the Constitution.
"Stop throwing the Constitution in my face," Bush screamed back. "It's just a goddamned piece of paper!"
Heck, I'd prefer if he just cheated on his wife, and who cares if he lies!
“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."
Theodore Roosevelt, 1912
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty"
Thomas Jefferson
2006-10-13 07:56:03 · answer #6 · answered by tat2me1960 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
this is alright to lie about sex. this is one hundred% favourite. Any guy that replaced into severe of bill's affair with Monica might want to were a loser. so a concepts as adult males are in touch that replaced into exceptionally favourite. it is like evaluating apples and oranges. The Ryan Lie might want to be extracted from a one hundred% sociopath He lied by technique of manipulating the data so as that human beings can imagine of him as ......" The bill lie replaced right into a nil.01% compulsive lie He lied because of he replaced into in touch about the kinfolk
2016-12-04 19:15:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You must be a redneck. Bush has lied about WAY more important things since his reign in office. 911, the war, WMD, etc., etc. So why do you support him? Clinton lied to us about having an affair. So he had some mistresses. Thats HIS business, not ours. Same as you having a mistress is your business, not ours. Him lying had ABSOULUTELY NO EFFECT on his job as president. Bush on the other hand, lied to the world telling them he had enough evidence to go to war...costing billions upon billions...and thousands of innocent lives. But to the average republican "that is all in the price for security" I never felt my security threatened once since i have been alive. There arent any little iraqis running around my yard with machine guns...wtf? Our soldiers are dying for oil...nothing else!
2006-10-13 07:08:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
"Kids these days" don't remember the Clinton administration.
Clinton got laid a lot. Bush is a bad president.
What do you think I care more about? A man bopping other women or an unnecessary war? Infedelity or efforts to set social agenda back to the stone age?
I want my birth control, my right not to practice Christianity, a good economy.... and that's it! Bush threatens all of that.
2006-10-13 07:02:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
Okay.... and how many times has Bush lied in office? He lied about the war ending, he lied about 9/11, and he lied about not having enough warning when Katrina hit. And you expect me to support him? I don't think so. I would much rather have an adulterer in the office than some redneck hick who takes vacations every other week.
2006-10-13 07:00:59 · answer #10 · answered by *Cara* 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋