war is certainkly not the answer.
2006-10-13 06:43:11 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
War is not the answer, I agree. Problem is those people are fighting amongst themselves and here George Bush has to go over there and bully them around. I'm sorry, but what right does he have to tell anyone they can't test nuclear missles. We did and still do. Who made him king of the world? Until our presidents stop acting like they are so superior, nothing will help the situation amongst other countries. They perceive us as thinking we own the world, and our president is trying to make that true. Sorry, I wish there was a sollution. GOD is going to come and fix it once and for all. GOD bless.
2006-10-13 08:20:50 · answer #1 · answered by cookie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, what is good is not very supported. Iran is self substaining enough that we can do nothing to them. North Korea is not. If China would refuse any refugees at their borders (which is so cruel to those trying to escape) and not allow North Korea to transport things through their country (such as nuclear items, food etc) and with join with everyone on sanction, North Korea would back down. Short of that war is the only solution if things continue to escalate. And war in both of those area as we have seen in the past is extremely difficult and will result in a lot of lives lost on both sides.
2006-10-13 13:54:20 · answer #2 · answered by rltouhe 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Put a bug in Kim Jong Ill's ear that Osama Bin Laden said that he is a sawed off little runt with a bad hairdo....
They will then proceed to blow one another up and we will literally kill two birds (vultures) with one stone...
This is said in jest... But if the CIA were actually an intelligence agency, as they claim to be... This would actually be more possible than not, as these two men are crazy and arrogant and nothing incites riots between the ignorant better than personal insults. Only rather than hair and stature... I'd tell one the other said their military sux...
It shouldn't be all that hard to get a short man with a God complex and a war monger fighting against one another... Should it?
That's exactly why we need more women in the White House... Condaleeza isin't doing her job if she isin't teaching the men to set people against the others and starting cat fights to take the heat off of us...
2006-10-13 13:52:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The yanks can do as much sabre rattling as they like but they won't stop North Korea and Iran joining the nuclear club. And why shouldn't a sovereign state decide for itself what its going to do? What was Richard's crusades all about? We and the Americans have poked our noses into other people's business too often.
2006-10-13 14:50:40 · answer #4 · answered by Jim S 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Diplomacy is the only way to resolve the nuclear crises in both countries. I agree that war is not the answer in both cases, it will never be the case.
2006-10-13 13:46:28 · answer #5 · answered by brian 2010 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its not the answer but seems like it might be the only solution. Not just war but there should be a special operation force that should be designed to take out menacing or threating psychotic dictators that have the potential to destabilize the world as we know it!
2006-10-13 13:46:40 · answer #6 · answered by johnblaze 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
how do you know war isn't the answer? it may well be. let's wait and see how it plays out
2006-10-13 13:52:52 · answer #7 · answered by kapute2 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
hydrogen bombs on both, they arent neccessary components of the world. if they declare war and attack us, then will you still continue to use diplomacy while our soldiers do nothing?
2006-10-13 13:50:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
if war is not the answer, what do you suggest,
2006-10-14 03:13:53 · answer #9 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dropping a lot of bombs
2006-10-13 13:50:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋