How on earth can a former president and a minority in congress, be responsible for everything that has happened on Bush's watch?
2006-10-13 06:17:10 · 8 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Remember this is the party of personal responsibility that just can't seem to stop blame everyone else for it's screw ups.
2006-10-13 06:28:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Exactly what in the hell did Homosexuals have to do with 9/11??
Any who.....
You know FDR didn't blame Hoover for the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.....he didn't give the Japanese 30 days to surrender either.....
How Many DUI's does Bill Clinton have? ZERO
How Many Does the Crowned Prince of America have? ONE
How many does the 1st successor to the throne have? TWO
How Many People Have died in a car accident at the hands of Ted Kennedy? ONE
How Many People have died in a car accident at the hands of Laura Bush? ONE
What does Monica Lewinski have to do with a 17 year old Page?
Besides the needless money that was wasted by Ken Starr?
But the Good News is that since Brownie was doing such a great job Louisiana will be a Blue State in 2008 no doubt if not Mississippi as well.....
I assume Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy went to Iraq and hid the WMD's just before the invasion.....
Mission Accomplished April 2003..... An end of major combat operations??? WOW!!! What is the Body Count now???
My fear is that we are going to be in such a shape military wise that the elected President in 2008 will have to enact a draft....
Then here we go with the NEO CONS blindly accusing the Liberals of a Draft. When truth is... a draft would relieve a lot of over extended troops in Iraq who have not saw their family in a year..... And when they get back they barley have time to change their underwear before they have to go back to Iraq....
We are in this war now so at least we could try to win it.... If it requires a draft then so be it as long as these troops are doing their 12 months and are done instead of 2 or 3 tours....
"Any outlaw regime that has ties to terrorist groups or seeks to possess weapons of mass destruction is a grave danger to the civilized world and will be confronted" GWB
Then he sends Condi-SLEEZA to Israel to ask them to please stop killing terrorist...
Has never confronted Hamas..... Never....
Being the President seems he'd be more mature than to call Kim Jong-il a pygmy....
A ******* Pygmy!! Is the Bush sitting in the Oval Office disguised as SHIRAZ???
This president is a fraud.... What needs to happen for some of these Sheep to just admit that he is a moron and a failure and a liar and just get on with it....?
All Clinton did was get a *******....
Sorry I am rambling but.... I am sick of SHIRAZ and his followers who have the mentality of a 12 year old.... It is a shame that with an election so close uninformed punks like this maybe swung the election.....
2006-10-13 13:51:03 · answer #2 · answered by JWAV 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Still, you have to wonder where this blame obsession came from. Democrats have blamed hurricanes on Bush. Repupblicans have blamed 9/11 on Clinton. It's ridiculous. I think that people like to delude themselves into believing that we could control EVERYTHING if we just tried harder!! No madmen making nukes, no natural disasters. It may be Bush's watch, but he can't prevent everything. Clinton may have missed some opportunities, but he's not psychic. Control Freaks.
2006-10-13 14:08:44 · answer #3 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you'd have to be more specific but if i were to guess it would go something like this...the current nuclear problem with N. Korea is the result of the Clinton admin. actually giving the N. Koreans nuclear technology for civil (power) uses on a promises that they wouldn't use it for military uses...which the N. Koreans promptly turned around and did.. Second...Clinton had numerous occasions to either kill or capture Bin Laden during his term but chose not to...(the Sudanese actually had him in possession and the Clinton admin refused to accept him) ... on the other had good things roll into another presidents term as well..the economy often starts it upward (in this case) or downward trend in one term and then the next gets the blame/credit for it... its called repercussions..decisions made in the past effect us today...
2006-10-13 13:25:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, Bush is recovering from the damage done by Clinton, has taken 6 long years but he is getting it done. The Congress is ham strung because the communist err I mean Democrats use filibusters and or it's threat to screw things up. Hope this helped you understand the workings of your government better.
2006-10-13 13:20:36 · answer #5 · answered by Meow the cat 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The same reason that Bush is blamed for the bad economy. People see something, and they automatically blame their enemy.
I, personally, think that homosexuals and pro-choice people are personally responsible for 9/11, every school shooting, every pedophile, and every molester. But that's just my opinion.
2006-10-13 13:18:41 · answer #6 · answered by ihatehippies 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
How can Bush be responsible for Hurricane Katrina?
2006-10-13 13:21:00 · answer #7 · answered by BillDict 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
if it weren't so easy............
2006-10-13 13:21:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋