at last ,common sense?

Question

in a city or town up north[england] i believe, a muslim teacher has been told to remove her veil thing which just shows her eyes when she is teaching english to non english speaking children,she has been suspended and i believe is appealing,how the hell are you supposed to learn english if you can only here the sounds coming from this womens mouth.kids need to see the mouth and the expressions as well.im just so glad someone in authority has finally had the balls to stand up to these muslim crusaders. and i dont care if she was or was not born here, its irelevant what she needs to realise that mask she wears not only can be intimmidating ,especially to youngsters, but a big minus in teaching a language to kids.thank god for common sence.and to all the we must respect her religion brigade.tell her to get a job answering phones where it wont affect her ability to earn a living.

silunaka fgs wake up and read marvins responce.think women ,not be blinded by your liberalist attitude.if you think its so great go try buy a glass of wine on a saturday night in the countries whaere this cult orriginated.

Answer 1

This is more of a statement that an answer.One of those veiled wonders wanted to get her drivers license with her veil on.When told to remove it,she refused.So,no drivers license.I have never heard of such ignorance.I have no problem if they want to practice their religion,but when you're here in America or in this case England, you need to RESPECT our laws.And if you don't agree,even if you are born here,then go over to where that stuff is mandatory.Can you imagine a bunch of those veiled whatevers going to a bank,or a jewelery store,or getting through the airport security? We don't know who or what the hell is under that thing.I'm with you,kudos's to someone not worried about being "politically correct"!!!
God bless

Answer 2

That was not a question and this is not an answer.
Children should be used to seeing hijabs as they are sharing a land and country with folk that wear them.
The next generation are going to be dealing with some hefty religious issues when they come of age. The last thing they need is ignorance and misunderstanding to help them on their way.

Answer 3

this isn't as sparkling decrease because it would want to seem.... In u . s . a . of america if you're wronged (someone steals you money, they carelessly reason your kinfolk lack of life, they loose your pants...) you the classic guy have the right to herald advantageous condition (no pun meant) in the court docket adversarial to them. you are able to ask however you want and also you've were given to justify what you're soliciting for. looks old Roy there had extreem psychological pain at someone loosing his well-known pants. perhaps they meant that a lot to him. (What in the journey that they were a pair bill Clinton gave him with... properly, it truly is why he replaced into laundering them), or what in the journey that they were those Churchill wore at the same time as he met the Queen.... You and that i do not comprehend why he idea he necessary fifty 4 million, notwithstanding it truly is for the opt to come back to a decision; accurate? Now as to him no longer being allowed to be a choose for loosing his case in court docket... does no longer a banker shop money in the commercial employer? does no longer a NASCAR motive force flow to the shop in his spouse's vehicle on Tuesday? The choose is authorized to sue someone, and he's authorized to loose. (He probable had a team of legal experts helping him with the in advantageous condition by technique of ways!) His area did not win. carried out deal. Now: "in my opinion" i imagine judges might want to be allowed to take an basic sense attitude to such situations and make awards to that end. Roy's choose must have presented him US$50 for a sparkling pair of pants. (yet what might want to he award in the dry cleaners lost an unique pair of Elvis' britches?) ok, my total element is, until eventually you're in court docket and pay interest to the reasoning at the back of the award volume being sought, you do not truly comprehend what the case is about. And in basic terms because he did not win in this argument that doesn't advise he's not a resonable choose daily in his court docket room. i do not comprehend why, yet he made a mistake. have not all of us?

Answer 4

yes we need to respect her religious convictions but in return She needs to remember there are different laws rules and mores for each society. if She wants to wear a veil when teaching in her own society this would be no problem but outside her society there are different rules just as if Westerners visit their society. When in Rome do as the Romans do -- or just don't go there.

Answer 5

I agree

Answer 6

I agree with you