but not allow Saddam a few weeks to prove he didn't have any?
2006-10-13 05:33:25 · 13 answers · asked by Snowshoe 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because they percieve NKorea wasn't (and still isn't) a real threat
2006-10-13 05:35:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 2⤋
MUSCAT you do know that weapons inspectors were in Iraq for years not two weeks. They did not give him two weeks to prove he didn't have WMD's (not nukes). And by the way not just the Republicans thought he had WMD's. Certain senators like Hillary, Kennedy, and even Saddams own generals thought they had WMD's available. I realize that does not fit a partisan confrontation you may want, but its the truth!
The last American administration negotiated a deal with North Korea. In exchage for almost 1 billion tax payer American dollars including aid for two water cooled nuclear reactors the North Koreans' "promised" not to build nuclear weapons. We can now see what good an agreement is with the former American administration huh - its kind of like one with the UN.
2006-10-13 05:37:57 · answer #2 · answered by netjr 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
N Korea carried out a exceptional form of its study in secrecy so by utilising the time the international found out they had already executed the final public of progression so struggling with it become impossible. added the storage web content and such are underground and confusing to break. by utilising attempting to wipe out the weapons and the centers it could have meant an all out attack the two interior the air and on the floor. N Korea has a super military and quite nicely equipped so it could have been a not common combat. added there is the distinctive threat of China entering the conflict on the ingredient of N Korea as become executed interior the 50s and the U. S. and S Korean forces are actually unable to protecting lower back that form of squaddies. actual numbers win. The terrain is packed with hills, mountains and such and the N Koreans have quite some bunkers interior the hills so a floor attack could be not common. Aerial attack against many bunkers could be met with a super volley of AA missiles making it not common to hit the bunkers as severe altitude hits won't do. mutually as N Korea had nukes they did not initially have a missile transport gadget which has for the reason that been progressed. They tried sanctions in the past with limited success and now are attempting to stop long selection missile progression yet lower back not doing so nicely.
2016-11-28 03:43:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam had 12 years to comply with inspectors. Not a few weeks.
Why do Democrats believe its okay for Clinton to send North Korea light-water reactors, and then blame Bush for allowing them a Nuclear program?
2006-10-13 05:37:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. But why did the Democrats craft the N Korea peace deal, give them billions and do nothing after they knew N Korea broke their promise and started developing nukes. The Dems actually gave the N Koreans nuclear technology as well.
Why did Bush go after Iran as opposed to N Korea, reasonable question. Well it was fithly Muslim terrorists who put planes in the World Trade Center, not Koreans, right?
It is Muslims who are blowing people up all over the world, not Koreans, right. Theres your answer.
2006-10-13 05:39:06 · answer #5 · answered by TG Special 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Exactly right!
We should have invaded N. Korea on Jan. 22, 2001.
As for Saddam - he deserved at least ANOTHER 10 years to "prove" that he was just a peace-loving man!!!
2006-10-13 05:38:52 · answer #6 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Saddam had more then a decade to prove he did not. What do you propose we should have done to North Korea, made another deal they won't keep like Jimmy did?
2006-10-13 05:35:57 · answer #7 · answered by MEL T 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was given 15 years of freedom(so to speak), Bush just ended the 15 year reign of horror..
If we went into N.Korea and did something, you democrats would complain that we acted too early, now you're complaining that we're not acting fast enough.
Huh, and democrats make fun of republicans.
2006-10-13 05:39:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Saddam had over 10 years to obey the UN .
Ask slick willy , he gave N. Korea the reactors .
If we'd bombed them , you'd be complaining about that .
2006-10-13 05:40:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why do some democrats (OK most) have the brains of 5 year olds? WHy are they constantly trying to rewrite history? Obviously history hasn't been too kind to them.
2006-10-13 05:37:16 · answer #10 · answered by JimZ 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
saddam was given time, he didnt even allow UN weapons inspectors, get your facts straight
2006-10-13 05:35:47 · answer #11 · answered by kunta kinte 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋