English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bottom line its their country, they should die for it not us.

2006-10-13 05:14:54 · 9 answers · asked by The Angry Stick Man 6 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

observer........you are too angry.

2006-10-13 05:34:14 · update #1

Is the fight against the US by Iraqis a fight for freedom? that is the question........

2006-10-13 05:38:02 · update #2

9 answers

Freedom is neither given nor partitioned out. It must be earned.

2006-10-13 05:23:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Wow - that's a tough one! I can't say I totally agree nor totally disagree with your statement. I just feel that it doesn't make much sense to "come to the rescue" of a country, (ruthless dictator or not), while there are so many serious issues in the US - downsizings, homelessness, poverty, millions of children across the country in foster care, increasing crime,etc. that sorely need to be addressed.

I feel Bush mislead the American public concerning his real reasons for invading Iraq, which almost makes it seem like our troops are dying and/or being seriously injured every day over a lie. And, it seems like the average Iraqi citizen doesn't even want us there.

Those billions and billions of dollars spent on the war in Iraq could be used in the US to help hurricane victims rebuild their lives, to help downsized Americans get back to work without taking huge wage cuts, to help the millions of children in foster care homes all over the country, to address the health care system, to help the homeless, to help the mentally ill, to help Vietnam Vets, etc.

It's funny you asked this question - I just started reading a book called "Operation Homecoming - Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Home Front, in the Words of US Troops and Their Families", published by the National Endowment for the Arts. The book consists of letters written by the troops about how fighting in these wars affects them, in all areas of their lives. The book was published very recently, but I got a copy at my local library.

Sometimes I just wish the US would decide to come to the rescue of itself for a change.

Great question...

2006-10-13 05:51:25 · answer #2 · answered by loveblue 5 · 0 0

I don't mind helping Iraqi's in a fight for freedom, the problem I have is the WE WERE NOT ASKED FOR HELP! When we fought the American Revolution, we asked other nations for help. Now, think of this, what if China rolled down our streets the way we are doing in Iraq, and they told us they are "freeing" us from that horrible Bush. No, GET OUT! They were a soverign nation whose citizens did not appeal to us for help, who lived the lives they created. We have bigger fish to fry right now, and we're playing deadly and expensive games in Iraq. A disgrace.

2006-10-13 05:29:23 · answer #3 · answered by melouofs 7 · 0 0

thank you for articulating a ingredient that I even have stated repeatedly lower back in Yahoo solutions and someplace else. finally, no genuine democracy can result from an outdoors rigidity mandating a rustic to be a democracy. in actuality, democracy by utilising coercion is an oxymoron if there ever become one. interior the in simple terms top diagnosis, that's why this entire organization that Bush has launched into is largely defective. the opt to be a democracy could desire to arise from interior a rustic, not be pronounced from without by utilising an M-sixteen, an Abrams tank, and a cruise missile. The combat for a democracy could desire to be carried out by utilising the indigenous inhabitants of the rustic who wish a democracy to exist, with on the main, minimum financial help from outsiders. each attempt we ever made to IMPOSE a democracy on a rustic has resulted in outright mess ups, or governments that in the time of basic terms positioned on the veneer of democracy, yet below are in simple terms as totalitarian as any openly dictatorial regime. Democracy is all approximately determination; unfastened determination. Iraq will in basic terms be a democracy in the event that they openly opt for to be. If Iraq fails to be a democracy, there isn't something our meddling ought to do to alter their destiny. So if that's the case, what's the ingredient of our struggling with? quite, you're able to desire to ask, nevertheless Bush could himself be an imbecile, lots of his advisors are found out adult men and females who of course know what I even have stated above. So why are our adult men death needlessly over there? user-friendly. that may not approximately organising a democracy. that's approximately perpetuating a conflict long adequate, and organising a puppet government which would be receptive to us, so as that we are able to make as plenty funds off the Iraq profession as a threat. All this communicate of becoming a democracy and struggling with a “conflict on Terror” are in basic terms pretexts that convince the credulous.

2016-11-28 03:41:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

uhm... you do realise that America had to fight for it's independance right? That required _help_. In fact we would not have one some of the battles, and thus the war, if it was not for the French.

Sometimes people need help to be freed from an opressing force.

and they are fighting for it, and they are dying for it. Don't you listen to the news? People are being taken off the streets and being killed because they support freedom in their country.
The politicians of Iraq's family are constantly in jeaporday and some have lost family BRUTALLY being murdered yet they fight on.

We are just helping them like the french helped us. Why would you walk away from a cry for help? Would you want to be left to those that would slice your head off or mutilate your body? Would you want to be saved?

2006-10-13 05:23:09 · answer #5 · answered by Jessica 1 · 0 0

Do u mean freedom from America, this is how I understood this question.
I think they were more free before America occupied them and now they are fighting for their freedom.

2006-10-13 05:31:46 · answer #6 · answered by observer 4 · 0 0

I agree. Freedom isn't free, it's earned through blood, sweat and tears. If it isn't your own blood, sweat and tears that paid for that freedom, then you're less likely to appreciate what's handed to you.

2006-10-13 05:24:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Exactly

2006-10-13 05:22:30 · answer #8 · answered by baddrose268 5 · 0 0

agree

2006-10-13 05:45:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers