Just a bit; maybe below her rear-end. It would still be VERY long, but not ankle-length long...
2006-10-13 04:49:22 · 12 answers · asked by Monic 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Yes, I think she should cut it to just below her rear-end. Crystal Gale's hair doesn't look as healthy or as thick anymore. It looked better when she was younger.
My daughters hair is down to her knees and now she wants it cut to below her rear-end. It gets in the way too much unless she braids it. It is hard to cut your hair if you've had it that length for so long. When I cut my daughters hair, I will probably have to cut it twice (half at a time) so it isn't such a shock.
2006-10-13 05:05:29 · answer #1 · answered by Ragdoll 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Is her hair still that long? Yeah of course she should cut it. What the heck can you do with it? It would be soooo heavy. She will feel much better when some is cut off. Less strain on the neck and head. She should donate it to locks of love. Hair that long went out in the 70's. It's okay if her grandmother said to keep her hair long, but geez thats crazy.
2006-10-13 11:58:33 · answer #2 · answered by Michelle 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I heard a story once about her hair and it said that her grandmother loved her hair and never wanted her to cut it. My opinion is if she likes it that way, that's what she should do. I could never handle my hair that long, if my hair gets very long now I get a migraine and have to cut it.
2006-10-13 11:55:18 · answer #3 · answered by happyme19672003 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yes I think maybe she should because all that weight from her hair must be bad for her neck just for that reason alone, I would cut it.
2006-10-13 11:54:52 · answer #4 · answered by redraven004 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I didn't even know she was still alive! I'd completely forgotten about her. That's some damned long hair though.
2006-10-13 11:58:26 · answer #5 · answered by Jimmy Crack Corn 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think there is a certain age where women need to cut their hair. I think she has surpassed that age. It's just not attractive anymore.
2006-10-13 12:02:08 · answer #6 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, that is her trademark. Her hair is who she is. She should leave it alone and be true to herself and keep it the way she likes it.
2006-10-13 12:07:38 · answer #7 · answered by ☺Smiley☺ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's her hair, why are you so concerned about it? It's really none of your business.
2006-10-13 12:40:03 · answer #8 · answered by basscatcher 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope..It's her signature look. She keeps it beautiful and looking great..so if she is happy with it, why should any one else be concerned?
2006-10-13 12:20:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES I DO. It looks bad once it gets too long, and hers is TOO LONG. It just looks stupid now.
2006-10-13 11:52:13 · answer #10 · answered by ~~ 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋