English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My previous question seems to have revealed the lack of morals and in some cases the lack of comprehension by liberals. I do not support Foley or the Republican from Ohio who just pled guilty to fraudulent activity. I do support our Presidents effort in trying to clean up the mess created by 8 years of a Child Molesters administration. If the liberals want to have any credibility at all they need to demand a candidate in 08 who will fight terrorism like our current administration is doing despite the efforts from the liberals to turn our country into a communist state controlled by Muslim terrorists.

2006-10-13 04:06:26 · 9 answers · asked by daydoom 5 in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

they are jealous that their names were not on the e-mail list

2006-10-13 04:11:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Because they have to grasp at things to bring up before an election that has nothing to do with policy since they are without any policy or plans. What suggestion has any lib made, so far this election, that shows some for thought?

2006-10-13 11:24:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

more name calling I see .The right wing talk about morals Now when it come down to it their the ones with no morals.I lost a brother in law in Iraq,at the service our senator Mike DeWine fell asleep what a good example that was

2006-10-13 11:11:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Liberals fought long and hard to make 16 years old the 'legal age' in DC. But when somebody actually tries to USE their laws, they don't like it??? What's up with that????

Can you say 'hypocrite'????

2006-10-13 11:16:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

because libs are hypocritical.

They are all for Gay Rights and killing infants but once a republican is ACCUSED of something the hypocrites come out in force

2006-10-13 11:10:20 · answer #5 · answered by smitty031 5 · 1 0

for real. george studds actually had sex with a 16 year old. foley only sent messages. as far as an islamo-communist nation, it will be mexican muslims, it will be called the "people's republic of islamica"

2006-10-13 11:10:15 · answer #6 · answered by kunta kinte 2 · 1 1

agree what is wrong with liking a 16yo boy?

2006-10-13 11:09:13 · answer #7 · answered by Staceyflourpond 3 · 0 0

What rhetorical garbage!!

2006-10-13 11:11:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why are the conservative whack jobs, trying so hard to make what he did ok?????????????????

2006-10-13 11:13:30 · answer #9 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers