9/11 was an inside job. Bring it on. I am waiting to embarass you. To many ppl have not done the research.
2006-10-12 20:17:58 · 11 answers · asked by Luke F 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Debate THIS, Luke:
www.popularmechanics.com Search for the story entitled "9/11: Debunking the Conspiracy Myths."
www.youtube.com Search for the series of films "Screw Loose Change." (They can also be found on Google)
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/...
http://www.debunking911.com/
http://underground.soulawakenings.com/ti...
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.ht...
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_...
http://austinbay.net/blog/?p=1348..........
http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/05/l...
You're not going to be embarrassing me!
2006-10-12 20:25:18 · answer #1 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I think you're probably wrong on this. I've seen the evidence on both sides but two things convince me it wasnot an inside job.
1. There's nothing to be gained by it that couldn't have been gained in a less dramatic way.
2. The reaction of the admin was surprise. If it had been planned, they wouldn't have had Bush look like an idiot reading to children for 7 minutes after the attack. They would have had the link to Iraq in place first because that was their goal all along. They kept saying, "find the link to Iraq" because they were planning on ousting Saddam from day 1. If it was planned they would have made a trail first.
2006-10-13 00:13:54 · answer #2 · answered by MathGuy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wont debate you because you are right....I think that it is hard to prove at this point but if you really look at all the facts, anomalies, omissions, distortions and just plain things that either don't make sense or don't add up you must conclude with an amount of confidence that the story we were all told is not what really happened. Everyone who is both skeptical in a healthy way or ignorant to look at the facts is probably disregarding some really compelling circumstantial evidence. We can't go into that right now but hopefully when the chimp is out of office the truth will start to come out.
2006-10-12 21:03:38 · answer #3 · answered by dharmabear 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You can't debate a theory. You have to prove it true first, then you can debate the FACTS. All you have is "theory" disguised as "fact".
Why bother? You will accuse me of being brainwashed, and I will accuse you of having your cheese slip of your cracker. . . You will personally insult me, and I will tell you that I will never agree with you, and that we must agree to disagree.
Why am I answering this? To tell you that I don't believe you, and I can get two points for doing so.
2006-10-12 20:46:28 · answer #4 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
If you are so smart why do have to go to Yahoo Answers for someone to debate with?
2006-10-12 20:30:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it was an inside job. The hijackers were INSIDE the planes as they slammed into the towers.
2006-10-12 20:20:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
If there was an ounce of credibility to your story it would be on the front page of every newspaper.
2006-10-12 20:36:44 · answer #7 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
ROTFLMAO woe babyrawl farkas and everyone else with evident brain activity, HIGH FIVE.
2006-10-12 20:49:30 · answer #8 · answered by frogspeaceflower 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
By research you mean "been indoctrinated by kooks." LOL
Yeah, everyone knows there was an unreported, twentieth hijacker: Elvis!
---
2006-10-12 20:29:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
One can only debate on matters based in logic and reality.
2006-10-12 20:38:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋