English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Would you rather get eaten alive by a tiger or get attacked by a tiger and barely live??? Which would you prefer?

2006-10-12 20:16:34 · 13 answers · asked by ruck_1978 2 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

13 answers

can i say neither and get the hell out of here?

2006-10-12 20:20:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Probably eaten alive. If I got attacked and barely alive who's to say I wouldn't die anyway? How long would it be before someone found me and called 911 for help? Plus depending on the damages done I would either be on life support, in a wheelchair or brain dead. Maybe all three and I wouldn't want to live that way.

2006-10-13 03:27:24 · answer #2 · answered by kim_in_craig 7 · 1 1

Attacked by a tiger and barely live. Im 2 young 2 die.

2006-10-13 03:19:45 · answer #3 · answered by HighRoller20 1 · 1 1

get eaten alive by a tiger.

2006-10-13 04:13:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Eaten alive.

2006-10-13 04:16:30 · answer #5 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 2 0

hmmmm live or die after a tiger mauls the hell outta me.... If I can, without being a burden to my loved ones, I'd like to live.... If I'm a quad., I'd wait patiently for death

2006-10-13 03:28:15 · answer #6 · answered by Islander 4 · 2 0

dieing is better than living halfly.i would prefer to get eaten.

2006-10-13 03:18:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I would want to barely survive, I'd still be alive right, just barely then I would recover.

2006-10-13 03:29:21 · answer #8 · answered by carmen d 6 · 0 1

get eaten alive lmao!

2006-10-13 03:20:00 · answer #9 · answered by InSaNe 4 · 2 0

Eaten alive......I`d hate to be disfigured or maimed!!

2006-10-13 03:28:11 · answer #10 · answered by melsbargains 3 · 1 1

I would rather just get mauled. I am not quite ready to die.

2006-10-13 03:19:09 · answer #11 · answered by HBPD 126 3 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers