With the new North Korean nuclear tests they obviously made the right choice. Right?
2006-10-12 19:43:25 · 18 answers · asked by navytec 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Yes but mostly no. They did not have any direct doing with 9/11 Go with the action and finish up in Afganistan and go after Iran and North Korea. They are the Major Bad Guys today.
2006-10-12 21:25:40 · answer #1 · answered by devora k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
America went after Iraq on intelligence report on piling of WMD and chemical weapons. Saddam would never be a dictator again nor Iraq will ever create the scenario that Saddam created, oppression. These days three States viz., North Korea, Iran and Pakistan need to watched and observed carefully.
2006-10-13 05:07:54 · answer #2 · answered by Virgo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey smart ***, we went after Iraq and Suddam because of intelligence. And no matter what you think, one thing wont change. Suddam will not ever have nuclear weapons and will never be a dictator again. We took care of the problem early enough in Iraq. You can blame Clinton for North Korea. Do some research before you say stupid things.
2006-10-13 02:49:19 · answer #3 · answered by Bucfan 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure am, also. . Not our fault that The UN made 16 resolutions and never had the b**** to back them. Not our fault that most of the people of the world are now to big of cowards to fight for what is right. and I will be glad when they go after N Korea and Iran. Unless Japan takes out N.K. first
Hey Andy- how come we went to Iraq for the oil and didn't take it. And where did you hear the BS he promised free gas to everyone in America. Are you that stupid or did someone that stupid tell you that.
2006-10-13 05:37:25 · answer #4 · answered by mark g 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I dont think it was the right thing to go after them especially because of the body bags we keep getting here everyday. But in this case it will be the end justifying the means what ever way it turns out. Korea was stimulated by our aggresive attacks in Iraq and used that as an excuse to foist their powers on the world. But as you see Bush claimed he is not going to respond to Korea with the same threats or tactics, he will lay back and ponder until they throw the first blow. That is wise because we are no match for China unless we use the Shuttle with the Stealth fighters and bombers only and take them out with our nuke missiles before they get started. For we should be doing that in Iraq but the UN opposes all that fire power but they dont mind the body bags? Either way people die on both sides it is not the answer. There is no answer with death you are just DEAD! No win situation like Viet Nam.
2006-10-13 02:51:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
America's enemies would be glad that Bush went to Iraq.
It will only bring disaster and embarrassment for USA.
Allied forces shall be forced to leave Iraq leaving more dear ones dead in hate occupied land with each passing day.
Let's see when the sense prevails and USA decides to be back home.
2006-10-13 04:14:51 · answer #6 · answered by Saadi 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Er, no.
First, I don't see the link between Iraq and North Korea.
Second, if they had to go after somebody, why not the Saudis? Most of the 9-11 suicide attackers came from there, not Iraq.
2006-10-13 02:54:00 · answer #7 · answered by 13caesars 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
After five years and nothing happen and they can focus on their work a bit better than with their high pitch hurting everyones ear on planet earth.
2006-10-13 05:01:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps you should have lent them your crystal ball.
Where will the next conflict arise 5 years from now?
2006-10-13 02:48:26 · answer #9 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
North Korea has no oil, only coal. When Bush and Rumsfeld finish pacifying Iraq they have promised every American free or cheap gasoline and heating oil for life.
Aren't Bush and Rumsfeld great!
2006-10-13 02:46:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋