What is the role of Bush in bringing this war?
2006-10-12 19:34:21 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
simple There was a roumer about IRAQ producing Destructble wepons.....
2006-10-14 02:45:32 · answer #1 · answered by ♣Ben *10♣ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
His role was to support it and it is a mistake. If the US did a Grand Jury style investigation for the case of Weapons of Mass Destruction the war would had never begun. Saddam Hussein is a murderer that deserves to die,but the war was about WMD and now the republicans say that they liberated Iraq. True but they STILL LIED. Vietnam was not about fighting communism,it was about fighting for big business especially American.
George Walker Bush stop talking of WMD after they realized that Saddam Hussein had only a poker face and nothing to back it.
2006-10-13 02:45:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are not old enough to recall the number of warnings from the UN, then rest assured there were 17 of them over a period of 12 years. When there was continued thumbing of the nose at the world, the last option was to do what was required.. The senate gave their approval with 90% voting in favor of invasion. That is where we got the famous blurting out by Kerry.. "I voted for it before I voted against it."
Since that time there have been so many conflicting stories, repeated so many times; too many people have accepted them as factual when in reality, they are pretty well made up.
So, as you can see.... there were a lot more people involved in the decision, other than the administration..
2006-10-13 03:26:51 · answer #3 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush and a few other United Nations countries decided that we needed to go to war in Iraq because of the war of terrorism. They believed that Sadam Hussien had weapons of mass destruction that was dangerous to surrounding nations and the rest of the world. Similar to the situation we are faced with now in North Korea.
2006-10-13 02:38:09 · answer #4 · answered by Cat 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Basically we were soft on Sudam after he reject the UN resolutions and kicked out the inspectors, mid 1990's
After 9-11, the USA re-evaluated it's 'soft' stance on rogue nations and decided that Iraq was a real or potential threat.
After all, he kicked out the inspectors to hide weapons... Nobody would have thought that he really did NOT have weapons.
Hind-sight is 20-20. Sadam did it to himself.
2006-10-13 02:42:44 · answer #5 · answered by MK6 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The role of Bush is to serve the Jew.
The role of Jew is to take over the world.
So the Jew must be stealth and powerful.
Needs a stupid guy to take the blame, and of course, petrol.
2006-10-13 03:20:20 · answer #6 · answered by ANTONIS GS 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is fighting the war that his Daddy couldn't finish.
2006-10-13 02:41:40 · answer #7 · answered by starrynight1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
errr what happend to those weapons of mass destruction???
I mean they were so sure about those weapons,that they killed millions of innocent lifes(civilians and Army troops both),billions of tax payer money gone,more increse in hatred for US foreign policies not to mention for AMERICA itself. SO what really happend to those weapons of mass destruction?
Why america is so afraid for other countires having nuclear technology,why does America thinks that he is /will be the prime target...Has america even consieder thinkning on this WHY?
2006-10-13 02:47:30 · answer #8 · answered by junooni81 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Weapons of mass destruction and the killing of the innocents, esp. the Kurds.
2006-10-13 02:41:52 · answer #9 · answered by Halo 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Don't you ever get sick of beating this dead horse?
2006-10-13 02:37:00 · answer #10 · answered by Kelly T 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋