English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think we could use a little compassion and understanding in the office.

2006-10-12 17:02:55 · 22 answers · asked by upsetinkenosha 2 in News & Events Current Events

22 answers

It depends on the woman and what policies she would bring to the office. Compassion and understanding are fine, really they are, but some times a Pres. has to be a real hard azz when it is called for.

2006-10-12 17:07:26 · answer #1 · answered by jxt299 7 · 1 1

It would still be a 2 sided political debate fest, just like you are seeing right now for instance... There should be no difference if a qualified woman is running. But got help us if it is Hillary. I would have no problem with Mikulski or Rice.

2006-10-12 17:16:49 · answer #2 · answered by baseballandbbq 3 · 0 1

I agree with Marybgirl, but the only woman currently in politics I would vote for to be President is Condoleezza Rice.

2006-10-12 17:14:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

That's silly. Historically, women leaders have been pretty murderous ( witness Hillary).

And as far as compassion and understanding, save that for your afternoons with Oprah.

2006-10-12 17:06:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Not me, it's too soon for a woman president.
Geez, all but one of our presidents have had Anglo Saxon heritage. How about a Catholic male president? We've on ly had one of those.

2006-10-13 17:12:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

USA deserves thye BESt possible person as president and if it is a woman, so be it but lets not go for Hilary or Connie Rice.

2006-10-12 17:10:17 · answer #6 · answered by devora k 7 · 1 1

That sure wouldn't be the commie queen Hillary Rodham Clinton . Too bad Condeleeza Rice isn't running .

2006-10-12 17:39:24 · answer #7 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0 1

I don't think it could get much worse!
Honestly, I think the US would be much better off with a woman in the presidency.

2006-10-12 17:10:59 · answer #8 · answered by Midnight Butterfly 4 · 0 2

Any coutry could use a "Mother" heading the state. So far, every president that called himself "Father" was a warmonger

2006-10-12 21:03:28 · answer #9 · answered by Diego A 2 · 0 1

I wouldn't care what gender the president was, as long as he/she put our national interests and security first and foremost, and wasn't so concerned about "international opinion."

I still get angry when I recall Kerry's statement that all American foreign policy must first be approved by "passing the global test."

2006-10-12 17:12:05 · answer #10 · answered by The One True Chris 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers