Do realize not all pro lifers are religious?

Question

I think religion is a farce but I will not try to stop you from being religious. I am pro life to the heart, and it has nothing to do with any religion. We are out here, us non religious pro lifers, and it is us you need to be aware of. We are not religious fanatics, we are clear headed, we think things through, and we will end abortion in time. We are atheists and agnostics like you, so you will trust us, and then we will destroy your insidious death worshiping institutions. I don’t believe in heaven that is why getting your chance to live now is so important, stop taking that from these children, stop robbing them of their only chance to live.

I support birth control fully. I just don't want children concieved that are not going to be allowed to live.

Answer 1

People even without a religion are pro-lifers if they believe that life is important. Many people who are against abortion and death penalty are atheists.

Answer 2

WOW. WBrian 28, you rock!! No one could say it better than you have.

I agree with all his points. What are you doing for all the children that have been "saved" from abortions?? It's a great "idea" that you have, but someone still has to take care of those children. Put your money where your mouth is OR don't force people to bring an unwanted child into the world simply because they made a mistake or had an accident.

What chances are they really given to "live"? Have you ever been in foster care? or an Orphanage?

You may not be a "religious" fanatic, but you sound quite crazy, none the less. I quote "we will destroy your insidious death worshipping institutions". They do not "worship" death, they are simply trying not to fear it.

Answer 3

Atheists believe in evolution and realize that life is continuous like a flowing stream and it's not a big deal if something happens and the flow is sent in another direction. Individual life is not precious. The species will survive even with abortions. In fact, there could be made the argument that women who even think about abortions should have them, because the genes for wanting to kill your own "child" aren't genes that would be good for the future. To use the law to get around human nature isn't good for the well being of the species.

Answer 4

professional-selection arguments at the instant are not consistent with technology, yet on emotion. They make statements like "a woman should not be compelled to have a toddler if she would not prefer it", yet they can't permit you comprehend why devoid of using some sort of emotional nonsense as "evidence". your finished state of affairs approximately forcible organ donation is in basic terms emotion-based arguing. It has not something to do with extremely technology. that's not information or evidence. that's in basic terms words. And that's not even a valid assessment. technology shows that an unborn individual IS an extremely residing individual, however two times now you have implied that they don't look to be residing. they are. What are they, on your opinion, in the event that they don't look to be human and not alive? technology additionally shows that the fetus isn't area of the female's physique or a parasite (there's a extensive distinction between gestation and a parasitical dating; they are 2 diverse organic and organic approaches). It has its very own unique DNA that isn't comparable to the mum's. It has its very own blood grant. It has its very own physique. It would not feed off the mum like a parasite sucking the existence out of a bunch. >you're using rights to a fetus that a residing individual would not have, After beginning, each human has the properly suited to not be murdered. An attempt on my existence violates my human rights and is punishable under the regulation; the comparable is genuine for each individual. Making it unlawful to kill an unborn human different than in cases of self-protection could for this reason be consistent with the human rights that born people have already got.

Answer 5

I was talking to my 60 year old anti abortion mother last night about the issue of abortion and I was amazed by her response.

She told me that before RoeV Wade it was always being reported about tragic deadly abortions. She told me women were
dying all the time. Just because it was okay for a man to knock up a woman but the woman was considered a whore and outcast.

She told me that even though she is 100% against abortion .We
as Americans do not have a real answer to stop it. None of us Rep and Dem really have the best inrest of women at heart. And somewhere along the way women have come to believe that abortion is a God given right.

As for you not being Christan that is your right, but please do not
think for one moment that because I am Christan that I have less intellect than you.

Answer 6

The odds are certainly against it. There isn't one single solitary group of people in the entire world who totally 100% ALL think the same way about every issue.

Pro lifers are going to find allies in both the conservative and liberal arenas, and everywhere in between.

And the same can be said for every and any other issue.

Answer 7

People need to understand woman didn't start having abortions with Roe vs Wade.

Women have had abortions since the beginning of time and will continue to have abortions if Roe vs Wade is struck down.

Only difference is thousands of women who can't afford to leave the country will once again die in back alleys and in their bedrooms.

Answer 8

And how many of them have you adopted?

How much energy, money, and time have you volunteered to prevent unwanted pregnancies?

What's your opinion on sex education, condom availability, and family planning?

If you can assure me that you would support all such things and that you actually care so much about this issue that you actually do something about it other than insult those who disagree with you, then I'll take back some of the things I've said in the other thread, becuase at least you deigned to not call your political opponents "pieces of crap".

But I really don't think you do. I can't believe you do when your previous question was so dehumanizing.

Answer 9

quit trying to rob me of my right to choose. All pro life drivel is useless, its my right, its my moms right, my sisters right, and sallys' down the street. A right.

And do you realize that not all pro-choicers would have an abortion?Thats why I giggle everytime I see some fool saying,

"they shouldn;t be called pro choice, they should be called pro abortion."

You have to be careful while extracting your head from your ***, as a bit of tearing could occur, and that may very well be painful for you.

I have never had one and never would, but i would certainly never presume to tell a women what she should and should not do with her body. Neither should you.

I

Answer 10

You are pro-life but not religious. lt's okay. You dont have to be religious to know what is right from wrong. All we need is to respect each other's belief.