Can you explicitly diffferentiate between morals vs. ethics? Perhaps with entomologies or what not.?

Question

I contended (since forever) that ethics was a person's personal system (not a support of relativism, but everyone has different views; not every christian agrees when it comes to whether or not it's alright to hit children to discipline them, for instance) and that morals was the general system (more vague most of the time, logically,) of the surrounding populus of a given area; morals of Miami Florida, of Florida, the US, Western countries, or the block I live on, whatever the designated sample. A kind of general concensus of the majority's ethical systems. Is this view correct or misguided? Have I been misrepresenting the two words? Mixing them up? Totally missed the mark?

also, if you disagree with my original definitions, and want to truely educate me, you'd better have references that check out. Like online textbooks, mabye...

Thank you very much. This will take some searching for a link I think and I respect someone that dedicated to helping out another philosopher! Cheers!

Answer 1

No real offense meant, but take a breath, and don't OVER think Life.

Both are learned behaviors and attitudes, and often driven situationally in spite of what we believe to be "right" or "wrong"

Morals are usually TAUGHT before ethics, and ETHICS are often in conflict with morality,,,again,,, situationally.

So sayeth Steven Wolf

Answer 2

Ethics should be seen as referring to the science of the moral. Moral should be seen as good.

thus, nothing is 'ethical' except for a discussion which deals with whether or not something is good or bad.

a problem with the terms Moral and Immoral, is that Immoral has somehow come to take on an almost exclusively sexual nature. if we start referring to Ethical as meaning Moral, we will eventually come to see Unethical and Immoral, which is a bad way to go.

ethics should be kept as a word describing the whole genre of analyzing the system of good and bad.

I would agree that "Morals" is used to describe particular value sets, but I think that the term 'Moralisms' is better. However the term 'moralism' is a generally negative term used to describe a way of thought that wants to enforce a particular set of values.

the above more or less agrees with Paul Tillich, "Morality and Beyond" most philosophical libraries should have it. don't bother with online junk... it's usually "lowest common denominator kind of junk."

Answer 3

Morals define very own character, on an identical time as ethics rigidity a social equipment wherein those morals are utilized. In different words, ethics factor to standards or codes of habit predicted by using the team to which the guy belongs. this could be national ethics, social ethics, corporation ethics, professional ethics, or maybe kin ethics. So on an identical time as a individual's ethical code is often unchanging, the ethics he or she practices may be different-based.

Answer 4

I will be much simpler with you. Ethics is choosing right from wrong, presuming there is a right and or a wrong. Morals is choosing a should do from a should not do, presuming that there is a duty to do so.

Answer 5

morals = thought
ethics = action