2006-10-12 15:25:44 · 20 answers · asked by USCalec11 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Matt Leinart is by far the better QB. He is a good, polished passer. Young has a long way to go to be an even average passer.
For more on Vince Young, Matt Leinart and the NFL. Check this site out http://factipedia.com/sportsblogs/
2006-10-12 16:20:22 · answer #1 · answered by Josie G 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Should be 2 different questions there. Who is a better athlete? Vince Young. Who is a better QB? Matt Lienart.
2006-10-13 00:31:59 · answer #2 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you really can't say who is better considering they are different types of quarterbacks : athletic (VY) and the norm (Matt). Right now Matt is posting better stats: completion percentage, yards per game etc. Vince Young is playing as good as any quarterback can at Tenn. Matt's receiving core is arguably the best in the nfl. VY doesnt have any play makers at that position. Right now matt is better. In two years VY will be. Keep in mind that VY has the same offensive coordinator that helped Matt win the Heisman, Norm Chow. Norm Chow has never had a quarterback like Vince so he has to revise the offense. When both their careers are over i believe both will be in the hall of fame though.
2006-10-12 23:21:46 · answer #3 · answered by answer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Matt lienart
2006-10-12 23:07:31 · answer #4 · answered by james w 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Matt Leinart...b/c Vince Young is a horrible NFL QB and will never have any kind of success or career like he did in college...why? Defenses are WAY to fast for him...he's too stupid to read NFL D's...the offense is way to confusing for him to master...at Texas he ran shotgun the whole time and there was like 5 plays that he ran...thats it. His arm is decent (better than Vick) but he just doesnt have the talent to get it done. Leinart wont be a franchise QB but anyone is better than Young at this point.
2006-10-13 03:56:59 · answer #5 · answered by wcbaseball4 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's a great question. I don't think you can really say for sure who is better at this point. Leinart is posting better stats right now but look at his receiving core....he's on a much better team than Young. Young is raw and could go either way...if he applies himself and becomes a student of the game he'll get better.
It really all depends on the team around them. You put Leinart and Young behind a lousy O-Line Young will dominate because he's mobile. Behind a good O-Line its really hard to say. Leinart is more accurate but Young probably has the stronger arm. If I had to pick at this point my bet would be with Young. He has the potential to be absolutely amazing.
2006-10-13 00:52:32 · answer #6 · answered by D-Man 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vince Young because he has the arm and the legs which will be good in the future. Also, Matt Leinart has two of the best WRs in the NFL but Larry Fitzgerald is hurt but he still has better players around him which definitely makes a difference.
2006-10-13 00:19:13 · answer #7 · answered by football chick 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Matt Leinart will develop into a much more successful quarterback because he is a much better pocket passer unlike Vince Young who likes to roll out and scramble and as we've seen with Mike Vick just leads to injuries and disappointments.
2006-10-12 23:38:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Matt Leinart (If you want to compare - at least spell it right).
Vince Young is just another mobile quarterback who can pass in the mode of Michael Vick and Kordell Stewart. probably not as good as Vick, but probably better than Stewart.
2006-10-13 00:36:40 · answer #9 · answered by Canadian Biology Man 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Take a glance at all the Stats. Yes, Matt Leinhart posted spectacular stats, but Vince Young. Wow, he played 2 quarters every game pretty much. Dont get me wrong, Leinhart can throw the ball, but you have to look at it in full detail. Vince is mobile, AND can throw the ball.
2006-10-12 23:13:21 · answer #10 · answered by ceeg 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋