Well? Anyone??
2006-10-12 15:11:56 · 22 answers · asked by bennyjoe81 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
well when you do, post it here, for this dumb ***** to have a source for the **** flying from her mouth
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlW9X9V0TJxBuBlns0dYzgrsy6IX?qid=20061012185548AAsNLmJ
2006-10-12 15:16:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
His lawyer
QUOTE
THE REAL QUESTION SHOULD BE WHY ANYONE SHOULD CARE ONE WAY OR THE OTHER. THE GOVERMENT DOESN'T BELONG IN THE BEDROOMS OF THE NATION.
WOW a giant leap to the moon
What ever happened to "I never had sexual relations with that woman"
Just like a Republican,,, another Republican can do no wrong,,, but heaven forbid that a democrat would so much as blow their nose!!!!!!!
2006-10-12 15:18:29 · answer #2 · answered by tom l 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ACLU assertion on protecting unfastened Speech of Unpopular agencies (8/31/2000) for on the spot launch long island--interior united statesa. very suited court docket over the previous few years, the yankee Civil Liberties Union has taken the edge of a fundamentalist Christian church, a Santerian church, and the international Society for Krishna awareness. In celebrated cases, the ACLU has stood up for each individual from Oliver North to the national Socialist occasion. in spite of all that, the ACLU has in no way inspired Christianity, ritual animal sacrifice, paying for and advertising hands for hostages or genocide. In representing NAMBLA right this moment, our Massachusetts associate would not propose sexual relationships between adults and young ones. What the ACLU does propose is solid freedom of speech for each individual. The lawsuit in touch here, have been it to prevail, could strike on the middle of freedom of speech. The case is consistent with a surprising homicide. however the lawsuit says the crime is the duty not of people who committed the homicide, yet of somebody who published vile textile on the internet. the thought is so effortless because it extremely is mandatory to genuine freedom of speech: people who do incorrect are liable for what they do; people who communicate approximately it at the instant are not. it extremely is effortless to safeguard freedom of speech whilst the message is a few thing many people discover a minimum of clever. however the protection of freedom of speech is maximum extreme whilst the message is one maximum folk discover repulsive. That became genuine whilst the Nazis marched in Skokie. It remains genuine right this moment.
2016-10-16 03:29:23 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
President Bush supports the cover-up,, and the lies by the Republican leadership, Deny Hastert, John Bohner,, Blont,,, Reynolds,,, Fodham testified today exposing Hastert (Leader of the Peoples House) to the cover-up of the Foley scandal,, shame on Republicans,, shame,, shame,, shame,, the GOP will go down in history in disgrace
2006-10-12 15:19:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Watch Fox Cable News.
2006-10-12 15:14:20 · answer #5 · answered by longliveabcdefg 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Umm... Michael Jackson? All the other little boy (okay so he was like 13 or 14) molesters out there in the world?
2006-10-12 15:12:55 · answer #6 · answered by Ashley P 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've voted Republican in the past...but no one, especially in a leadership role, should get away with the crap that M. Foley was getting into. Get him outta there!
2006-10-12 15:13:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Gay Republicans for Jesus Club is bending over backwards for the Pages.
Go big Re Go
2006-10-12 15:13:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
On here? No, only pedophile loving Liberals cant seem to get enough of talking about him. Really makes you wonder..
2006-10-12 15:22:34 · answer #9 · answered by itsallover 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Give me a break. Some things are indefensible. Preying on children is one of them.
2006-10-12 15:14:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
President Bush is< No, wait that is Haster, the man who covered up for him
2006-10-12 15:13:49 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋