http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1221.cfm
http://members.tripod.com/~rcjustice/pres.html
Clinton was in office in my growing up years, so this is all pretty shocking to see. Is it true?
2006-10-12 13:49:32 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
lol!!! Hell No!!! It's Not Analytical Information(it can't be proved)!!! People Make That Stuff Up To Make Others Look Bad, Usually Bored People Who Are Wacked Out Of Their Minds Come Up With This Stuff......
2006-10-12 13:53:19 · answer #1 · answered by Can't Make A Good Avatar!!! 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Clitoon is really a joke but I would put very little past him in terms of him seeking fame and fortune, which he has done quite well. In the end when the dust settles and the socialists move on to some other hero I believe much more about slick willy will come out, much, much more.
Have you seen this one?
http://www.roadtowealth.com/GPStory.htm
I have tried to chase down the pieces and you know what, this one has legs and even though it is wild, it could end up being true.
2006-10-13 18:45:29 · answer #2 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clinton had some key ethical and military issues, no doubt. One author wrote that he lost the nuclear launch codes. Twice! He definitely dropped the ball on Osama Bin Laden, indirectly claiming that bombing a US embassy and a US battleship were not enough "legal justification" to bring him to justice. He simply did not consider military issues and terrorism that important. The Democratic party still doesn't consider it important!
But these writings are either lies, exaggerations, or simply out of context. For example, both sites mention the number of dead advisers of Clinton. Compare that to the number of dead advisers of Bush (1988-1992) or Bush advisers who quit between 2000 and 2004. The witchcraft writings are simply garbage. Ignore.
2006-10-12 20:59:33 · answer #3 · answered by Polymath 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
These sites make me think the Republicans are getting pretty nervous and desperate. Clinton isn't running for office.
2006-10-12 20:54:52 · answer #4 · answered by Constitution 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I usually don't trust cites that look like they were put together as part of a high school class project...
but that being said... it's possible... but I find it unlikely that a man that couldn't keep his sexual exploits under wraps could keep a murder spree under wraps...
I would consider it about as likely as Bush being behind 9-11... both about a gagillion to one odds...
2006-10-12 20:58:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are plenty of GOOD reasons not to like Clinton. The links you site are not among them.
2006-10-12 20:58:45 · answer #6 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of these are lies or gross exaggerations.
Remember to consider the sources of stuff you find on the internet - find out who they are and what they stand for before you believe what they say.
2006-10-12 21:16:57 · answer #7 · answered by 63vette 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
most of the things people say about clinton are true just like bush .
2006-10-12 20:51:17 · answer #8 · answered by playtoofast 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Kenndy and Johnson were pres in my growning years, and am a Ronald Regan Fan by choice. Be you
2006-10-12 20:54:07 · answer #9 · answered by Scott B 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I have learned that you can't make up anything about Clinton that is WORSE than what he has DONE!
2006-10-12 20:55:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋