would the cowboys have a better season if they start romo instead of bledsoe, think about it...would you rather develope a new talent or stick with the veteran that cant complete passes and stays in the pocket too long? can they have a winning season with the way bledsoe is playing?
2006-10-12 13:32:49 · 8 answers · asked by oldskool 2 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Bledsoe.... It is too early to give up on the season. The Boys are still expecting to make the play offs. If rookie Pat Watkins had not giving up two big plays we would have not been playing from behind and would have won the game against the Eagles and been in first place. Don't expect to be seeing Romo any time this year unless they lose 8 or 9 games not 2.
2006-10-12 18:53:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bledsoe has not performed well most of the season. I have a lot of respect for Coach Parcells and his judgement, but this team appears in need of a QB who can run if necessary and make better decisions on when and where to throw. The game against the Eagles was hard to watch for all of us Cowboys fans especially the end when Bledsoe threw two INT and gave the game to the Eagles. The Eagles don't need gifts like that to win games, but they will certainly take them when given. Maybe Romo is not the answer either, but I feel it would be better to find that out now rather than next year.
2006-10-12 22:04:58 · answer #2 · answered by perdidobums 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it doesn't matter till they start protecting the QB
"think about it...would you rather develop a new talent or stick with the veteran that cant complete passes and stays in the pocket too long?"
why would you get your QB or the future hurt and destroy his confidence playing behind that line? Plus, Dallas is not ready to give up on the season, they have only played 4 games and if they improve the line they will be a playoff team, you only start trying to "develop a new talent" when you know the season is a waste and start playing for next year
2006-10-12 21:55:02 · answer #3 · answered by rare breed 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bledsoe...if they would keep the qb protected he could get pass the ball. But then again maybe they should try Romo and see what happens. Because I really don't know anything that about football.
2006-10-12 20:43:05 · answer #4 · answered by mccary555 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bledsoe. Romo doesnt have the experience yet(I dont mean playing experience but what to do in this situation knowledge), to be a week, to week starter in the NFL. the games they lost, did'nt have a lot to do with the quarter back position but, receiving, o-line and, kicking if I know Parcells, He wont give in to fan pressure but do what He thinks is best for the team. after all, its His job and, His reputation.
2006-10-12 23:51:30 · answer #5 · answered by ny21tb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I laugh whenever I see Bledsoe. He is exactly the same as he was with NE except when he was with NE, I cried
2006-10-12 20:35:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe they should go with Bledsoe... he is an ultimate quarterback.. and has a few years left in him.. i think NE should have kept him instead of Tom Brady!
2006-10-12 20:38:51 · answer #7 · answered by andersen826 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
romo with a locked up win if he starts and if terrel stops his girlish whining if he dont get the ball
2006-10-12 20:46:50 · answer #8 · answered by Scott R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋