2006-10-12 11:40:03 · 14 answers · asked by wjscottjones 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The great anti-incumbent swing of 2006.
I can hear the screams coming from the inside of the Cato Institute already.
2006-10-12 11:46:13 · answer #1 · answered by buzzfeedbrenny 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Liberals have embraced the so-called Man-boy love crap agenda long ago . Are you trying to say that political parties should cast votes based upon sex ?
Is this the "new" democrat ? Is this what communism spells ?
Apparently Foley was not only misguided in his extracurricular activities -he obviously should have been a democrat because Republicans do not condone what he did . Unlike the left- when Ted Kennedy was out taking the life of a young girl , the left believed him when he said he forgot she was in the car - Republicans didn't believe him and Republicans are outraged at Foley's antics. Unlike the left-when Bill Clinton sexually harassed Paula Jones the left said he was a good guy; the rest of us said he was a pervert . In the past -the liberal left has "laid claim" to gay rights-as tho being gay meant you had to be democrat . Since the left's "October Surprise" it seems to be popular for democrats to "out" certain gay Republicans -as though it were a crime . Is there anything you will not stoop to ? I'm voting Republican . Who wouldn't ?
2006-10-12 11:59:30 · answer #2 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look up what NAMBLA stands for and then see that they donate to the democratic party. As for how I'll Vote. My vote will go to the candidate I think will do the best job representing My views. Which means I might be voting a Split ticket, then again I might vote a Straight party ticket simply because people from the LIB side like you annoy me WHY? Because you care More about the Democratic party than you ever did about the USA. It's happening more and more in BOTH parties and its complete BS. The USA should come first.
2006-10-12 12:05:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's not synonymous and I'll tell you what it's synonous with, as follows:
Foley was a setup by Dems, and it's synonymous with their setting up illegals to vote, and taking ballot boxes 4 miles off the coast of California and sinking them to the bottom of the Pacific.
2006-10-12 11:47:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It will not change my way of voting. 1 bad apple doesn't ruin the whole bunch. It's not like the Dems are a bunch of angels either.
2006-10-12 11:47:53 · answer #5 · answered by parrothead2371 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The same way I was gonna vote. Why hold a whole group (as the dems are fond of saying) responsible for 1 person's actions.
2006-10-12 11:46:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
So a Florida repub turned to be a Mass dem, that will influence national politics? Barney Frankism it should be called
2006-10-12 11:46:19 · answer #7 · answered by Scott B 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It depends. If they accept USA is not united and use or practice the ideology to make USA United again, that will change everything. USA is not united. That is the worst enemy of USA. Lets help the Noble people of America with the Ideology of Union, grounded in: "Lets be Genuinely Sincere, Grateful and Respectful, with The One Who Gave us Life, with Mother Nature and with ourselves" This Ideology is complete in my attached book "AWARENESS, The Meaning of Life" edited by VANTAGE PRESS in New York, NY) as a gift for you and also translated to the Spanish language. Please find as a gift, yes as a gift, in the source below and please resend to your friends. Lets be together in this help to The Noble People of America, by Conviction, more than by laws and threats. it is accepted by Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Christians, and so on, my dear friend. Lets be together helping each other instead of despising, Please, Please you may be a strong leader. Please if you like this, resend to your friends, my dear boy or dear girl.
2006-10-12 12:00:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Doing the propagandizing way before it can be effective are you not? no wait. any time is a good time to lie. I disagree . with your accusation.but you have a right to lie and spread crap if you please. I would fight to the death for your rights, so go for it. I do not think the sheeple of the u.s. will listen baa baa baa. well maybe I am wrong.baa baa baa .you little sheeple. you believed bush s lies and still do,ah aha
2006-10-12 11:57:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
another dyed in the wool bleeding heart liberal democrat.
or as Michael Savage says, another "demoncat".
haven't you guys learned your lesson from slick willy? our country is STILL reaping the crap he sowed with North Korea.
he was too busy diddling monica to attend to his job as president---what a lame-o.
2006-10-12 11:49:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋