English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Which scenario is worse?

a) Eaten by your family member.
b) You eating the family member.

2006-10-12 11:16:27 · 41 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

41 answers

Having to eat a family member.

2006-10-12 11:17:42 · answer #1 · answered by Celebrity girl 7 · 1 1

Me eating the family member

2006-10-12 11:22:24 · answer #2 · answered by sunflower222 5 · 0 1

Well if a family member had to eat me after I died I would not know about it. If I had to eat a family member I would probably go nuts.

2006-10-14 15:18:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You eating a family member, because if they eat you, then you no longer have to worry about life, but if YOU ate a family member, then you'd get the hint that you were insane and a cannibal.

2006-10-12 13:07:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Having to eat a family member without BBQ sauce. Such a waste.

2006-10-15 19:31:55 · answer #5 · answered by charley128 5 · 0 0

A is worse. At least if I'm eating one of my family members, I can wash it down with a nice cold beer and a side of fries.

2006-10-12 11:18:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

you eating the family member.

2006-10-12 11:25:19 · answer #7 · answered by Natalie Rose 4 · 0 1

me eaten by a family member, even though they would never do that

2006-10-12 11:18:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Depending who you are.

If you dont care/have no conscience then you eating your family member is pretty deli-ci-ous. So i guess that's worse but if you think about it - it's pretty much the same

and nop I wouldnt eat unless i was EXTREMELY HUNGRY

2006-10-12 11:25:06 · answer #9 · answered by axlrose 2 · 0 1

Eatin a family member. If I'm already dead I dont give a sh*t what happens after that. LOL

2006-10-12 11:23:29 · answer #10 · answered by ? 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers