Not necessarily. Not every species is guaranteed a part in evolution, just look at the dinosaurs.
2006-10-12 10:56:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Leda 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ok, evolution is not something quick. It takes seveeeral years to happen. If the warming happened gradativelly, then we would be constantly adapting ourselves to these new temperatures. However, the main problem is not with us, but with Earth itself. The artic ice is melting, and this leads to a substantial increase in the oceans' volume, what might cause islands and cities to disappear completely. Besides, this warming is impairing the whole weather of the world, leading to hurricanes and storms. It doesn't matter how much we evolve, we will still be fragile creatures before such climatic catastrophes, and they will still destroy us.
Worrying about the global warming has nothing to do with accepting the evolution theory.
2006-10-12 11:06:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Syaoran 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because evolution takes a long time. And usually the environment changes over a long time. When humans dramatically change the environment over a short time period, evolution can't work that fast. It isn't humans that are really in trouble, it is the rest of the animals. For example, the Pacific ocean around Australia has increased in temperature slightly, but the Great Barrier Reef is dying off because it can't adapt quick enough.
2006-10-13 06:16:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Take it from Toby 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well apart from the fact that evolution takes a ridiculous amount of time, humans don't evolve through natural selection any more.
Due to the nature of our society and medical expertise, we do not tend to evolve as described in nature. Our intelligence is our own downfall.
2006-10-12 11:03:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Stuart T 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
>Why blame it on guy, in simple terms evolve and adapt. Evolution would not extremely artwork that way. If species ought to evolve quickly adequate to proceed to exist any disaster, we could in no way have seen mass extinctions such by way of fact the ok/T boundary or the Permian extinction. in actual actuality, for human beings and maximum different species of macroscopic organisms, evolution is lots too sluggish to maintain up with international warming. >in my view i think of the earth is in simple terms attempting to desirable itself. in simple terms before the flood, throughout Noah's time, the earth became supposidly not tilted, it had a tropical climate over the full earth and had a vapor cover that coated it. The Earth in no way had a tropical climate over all of it. Even without the lean interior the axis, the poles could nevertheless exist, and could be exceptionally much as chilly as, if not less warm than, they are actual. in spite of if issues have been warmer than they at the instant are at particular situations interior the previous, extra these days it has on the whole been cooler, and it is at present approximately as heat because it has ever been in the previous quite a few hundred thousand years.
2016-11-28 02:19:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The same reason that I would be worried if an asteriod was hurtling towards Earth... life will survive and millions of years later will get back to new 'normal' but in the meantime things won't be as pleasant as they were.
2006-10-13 00:23:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolution occurs on time scales that humans can not appreciate...Anthropegenic forced climate change has only taken a couple of hundred years.
2006-10-12 11:00:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by brooklyncpl 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am not worried about global warming......
2006-10-12 10:49:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by whidd2003 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You must be kidding. No one can be this unthinking.
2006-10-12 10:56:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by robert r 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Please refrain from speaking, or writing. You'll appear much brighter this way.
2006-10-12 10:56:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Clark W Griswold 4
·
1⤊
0⤋