English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

I believe that in most instances, police should NOT shoot to kill. They should be good enough marksmen to bring a perpetrator down without mortal injuries. That kid probably got the gun from the internet. Everything is for sale on it.

2006-10-12 12:35:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The police should shoot to neutralize the threat. If this means he dies then thats the students problem. I think the kid by bringing a loaded assult rifle to school and firing it shows intent to commit murder.

I'd love to know where he got the AK, I'd buy 2 if i could

2006-10-12 10:58:44 · answer #2 · answered by msko06 3 · 1 0

He bought the AK-47 after the Republicans let the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban expire.

2006-10-12 10:52:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

his parents had it. they said it was their right to have a machine gun. I think police should be able to shot and worry about gettign sued later

2006-10-12 11:17:44 · answer #4 · answered by catchup 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers