Im seing the right attempt to draw up some kind of reid scandal to take the pressure off of their dirty deeds, will it work?
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001782.php
2006-10-12
10:25:00
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
it was funny watching "fox and friends" try to start a rumor, they ended up staring at each other in near silence after they ran out of spin.
2006-10-12
10:28:08 ·
update #1
Trying to drum up a scandal wont change the culture of curruption that plagues the Repubs.
2006-10-12
10:55:43 ·
update #2
Jesi, you MACACA!
Check your mailbox for dead Cow Head.
2006-10-12
16:57:20 ·
update #3
Yes, the cons here have tried and convicted him. They've asked why hasn't he resigned yet? Here's what Reid did or didn't do. He owned property, transfered it to a partnership where he was a partner. In other words, he changed the legal form in which he held the property from owning it as an individual, in fee simple, to owning it as a member of a partnership. The purpose was to combine his parcel with another guy's for purposes of future sale or development. No money was exchanged when his form of ownership changed. He didn't put this on his Senate disclosure form that year. Three years later, he sold the property for $700,000 more than he bought it for 6 years earlier, and he reported THAT amount on his Senate disclosure. No crime, perhaps not even an ethics violation. Probably a witch hunt and a technical violation.
There's an up to date article on washingtonpost.com now - Reid Land Deal Under Scrutiny
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/11/AR2006101101640.html
2006-10-12 10:27:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by TxSup 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
Actually, the fact that North Korea may (or may not) have a nuclear weapons would distract any sane person from a scandal involving a Republican who is no longer in congress.
The Harry Reid thing is stupid too. Shady, but hardly relevent to the true issues.
2006-10-13 03:11:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by MEL T 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dude, the guy forgot to mention his involvment in real estate deals. Its the same thing he is accusing Allen of doing, not reporting income (except Allen's undeclared stock options have a negative net worth and Reid made over 1 million dollars).
Plus his business partner is a bit shady, he benefitted from a government land swap. Oops, I hope Reid didn't vote on that one..
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061011/D8KMO6NG0.html
2006-10-12 10:32:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
If Fox and talk radio all started broadcasting the comparable way because of fact the long island circumstances, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CBS or PBS and NPR, their rankings could pass the comparable way, so except they reversed polarity too, no you will hear to Obama, Pelosi and Reid, the liberals are caught with them now as an challenge-free remember of skill, style of like a foul hangover, democrats are wishing they awoke in mattress with somebody else. the two events have been giving us applicants for an prolonged time that we can basically shrug and say "the lesser of two evils" as quickly as we vote, the only ingredient quite shared via the politicians in Washington is tehy all concern term limits or commonplace, standard human beings filling elected workplace. Elitists like Susan Esterich recommend this may be the tip of the worldwide, yet we can see the place the expert, occupation politicians have taken us, and that incorporates regulation professors who think of they are too important to pay their parking tickets. you need to grab human beings off the line at random, clarify how lots money we owe, how lots we can borrow or print, and how lots we can spend, and that i guess they could do a greater desirable pastime fixing an austerity budget we ought to stay to tell the tale on, in simple terms as ordainary anybody is compelled to do daily of their lives.
2016-10-19 07:07:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Get off it, we ran Foley out of Dodge. And as for Reid, everybody knows he is crooked as a dog's hind leg.
2006-10-12 10:28:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by LoneStar 6
·
5⤊
2⤋
Foley's your hero? Another reason the neocons have to go!
2006-10-12 10:28:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Dems will be controlling the House and Senate after this election, thank you Mark Foley!
2006-10-12 10:28:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by onottopilot 4
·
2⤊
4⤋
Foley is doing very well.
Thousands and thousands of Democrat men have asked him to take them out on a date.
Democrats' think he is macho.
2006-10-12 10:30:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
wow you are obsessed with foley Is it a good time for you to come out of the closet or did you miss your nambla meeting again
2006-10-12 10:26:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED THEY ARE ALL A BUNCH OF CROOKS AND SLEAZY LY SCUM BAGS AND SHOULD ALL BE THROWN OUT OF OFFICE .
THEY HAVE BEEN THERE TO LONG .
THEY ARE TO COMFORTABLE IN THEIR OFFICES AND WE SHOULD MAKE THEM A LITTLE UNCOMFORTABLE .
MAKE THEM GO OUT AND GET A JOB LIKE THE REST OF US AND WORK FOR A LIVING .
MAYBE THEN THEY WILL UNDERSTAND WHEN WE SAY , WE WANT DESCENT PAY FOR DESCENT JOBS. , CLOSED BORDERS , AFFORDABLE HEALTH CAR AND GOOD SCHOOLS FOR OUR KIDS .
DO YOU THINK THEY MIGHT LISTEN THEN !!!!
2006-10-12 10:48:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋