English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-12 09:46:58 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

When are the idiot warmongers going to accept that the big fool GWB is wrong about Iraq and he has made a mess of things. Just think if it was 600000 Americans.

2006-10-12 10:42:57 · update #1

14 answers

whatever the number it is gross ... way too many ... the only reason the figures are disputed is to distract from the real argument/story ... and it works.

People are too busy arguing about the numbers ...


Dr Bad

2006-10-12 11:24:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I'm trying to find the source where i saw it, but Zogby (the polling company) was on BBC yesterday and said this report is 95% accurate. Again we'll never truly know the exact number, so if 655,000 is inaccurate, i'm sure 30,000 is just an inaccurate.

2006-10-12 10:29:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think that figure is accurate but then again neither is Bushs' figure of 30,000.
The fact is that INNOCENT iraqi's are being killed every day by insurgents/suicide bombers.This would not have happened if the US and coalition countries had not invaded.
Saddam Hussein was an evil man but at least the Iraqi people knew who their enemy was.Now it isn't safe to walk the streets in Iraq without fear of being killed.
truckman
I seriously doubt that you would know a 'real man' even if he *****-slapped you

2006-10-12 10:10:45 · answer #3 · answered by rosbif 6 · 2 0

That number seems insane compared to what happened in WWII. I question the accuracy. That being said, it can be very difficult to fight a war when one side hides in schools, homes, and hospitals and does not wear the uniform of a country. I hate to see a lot of innocent people die, but imagine if a nuke was detonated in New York City or Los Angles.

2006-10-12 09:56:50 · answer #4 · answered by united9198 7 · 1 0

yep its awful cant rearly see it being that high of a figure but alot of people have been killed tragically but in the big scheme of things thats what happens when you try and help people that have gone through generation and generation of brainwashing and abuse ,nows the time when were gonna pay for it because all it has done is brought all the fundamentalists so much more support worldwide given them more people to spout there propaganda and there will be many more attacks on innocent people what you have to remember is most of these people were killed by there own people .

2006-10-12 10:07:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I'm no fan of President Bush, but you also have to consider that the Iraqi's are killing each other and blaming it on Bush so those numbers are also included. Let's bring our troops home and put them to work guarding the ports. In other words, defending us!

2006-10-12 09:59:27 · answer #6 · answered by nursesr4evr 7 · 0 1

Thats 655,000 less muslims we have to worry about,but do you think less were dieing under saddam,in case you have`nt noticed its muslims killing muslims,what do you think they will do to you sissy liberals if they they get their way,on second thought lets let them get their way so they can get rid of you ,and then the real men amongst us can began to fight ,with out having to listen to you liberals whine about human rights,a fight is a fight to win,damn human rights.

2006-10-12 09:56:27 · answer #7 · answered by truckman 4 · 1 1

I would think the true figure is much higher. So much for liberation and peace by Blair and Bush.

2006-10-12 09:53:59 · answer #8 · answered by deadly 4 · 4 0

We have quite a few here in England that we could send back to replace them.

2006-10-12 10:00:19 · answer #9 · answered by hakuna matata 4 · 0 0

17, the average number of maltesers in a single packet !!!

2006-10-12 09:54:29 · answer #10 · answered by kevinmonaghan1977 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers