I dislike people who expect cotton candy and roses out of war. No war has good results......usually one side frees another and then everything else "reasons included" are hit and miss.
The man is not destroying the country any more than the last guy, or the guy before him, or the guy before him, and so on, and so on. People who label other peoples beliefs crazy and stupid are what drives the wedge, because you push people into one side or another simply by offending them.
Now that's what I don't get.
2006-10-13 09:17:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by j615 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Don't categorize all of us that support Bush by saying that we expect everyone to support him, because it's not true. It doesn't affect me in the least if someone doesn't agree with my views and opinions on the President and the war. I think everyone is entitled to feel however they want, and it's unrealistic to think that all Americans would ever agree on who we felt was best to run our country. That's why we have elections, and it's why we have more then one person running for office.
As far as protesting, do it all you want. It's not going to get Bush out of office, and like it or not, it's a waste of time! But if it makes you feel better, then you should absolutely do it. I would hope that in these protest that most people would leave the Military alone, because they are simply doing their jobs. People shouldn't take their anger for Bush out on our men and women serving for our country. But even this hate that some Americans do feel towards the Military isn't illegal, so you're free to say, feel and do what you want.
It seems to me you're the one that is getting very excited and angry because not everyone agrees with your hatred of the President. You don't have to like it, but you need to realize that we're entitled to support the President, and we don't owe anyone an explanation for it.
2006-10-12 10:11:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Naples_6 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Seeing that he was appointed president for the second term. I would say he has more supporters than anyone else......at the time.....at the time when people had backbone. But, the politicians have been fighting this war and have ruined what a ware is supposed to be about. To tell a general he cant go there or there or there is just plain silly. To me if we have to play games like this then yes we should get out. If we want to fight a war then lets fight a war, not cut and run
2006-10-12 10:06:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What I really don't understand is two things:
Why are people so extreme. Meaning, why do republicans feel they're fellow republicans are perfect and why do democrats feel the same? Bush, Kerry and Clinton are human. Not superhuman and they're gonna screw up. No one's perfect. Period. So when they're wrong people just need to say "you're wrong". That doesn't mean you don't support them.
#2 Why have people forgotten that although he got Saddam out of power, and we're spending billions for a government that's not our own, Bin Laden's still out there running amok?
Get his trifling a%%, and you've got something! Bin Laden didn't care if we were republican or democrat when those planes flew into those buildings! He was aiming for, AND HIT, Americans!
2006-10-12 10:20:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by dct1218 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, the CRAZY ones bother me, too. I'm a non-crazy Bush supporter.
I think his faith is his own business, I think protesters have every right to protest, I don't see how he's destroying this country, and as far as the war is concerned, I HOPE some good comes out of it, I PRAY some good comes out of it and I KNOW that I will support our troops.
2006-10-12 09:47:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
you are able to comprehend that admitting Bush became a bust could tear a hollow interior the soul of many Bush supporters. How can they enable anybody understand they goofed? I too would be vote casting Libertarian in this pass around, as the two one in all the different events are purely no longer doing issues on behalf of the yankee human beings.
2016-10-02 05:53:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is apparent that you and many others do not understand what is at stake here. The president of the United States is doing what is necessary for you to live the life style I assume you are. I hope you are a US citizen. Even though you don't sound link one. If we leave Iraq or any other country in question and we are in deep trouble. We will not leave even if God forbid a Democrat the caliber that is going to run is elected, the enemy does not want us to just leave and thing will be just fine, THEY WANT TO KILL YOU ME AND ANY OTHER PERSON THAT WILL NOT CONVERT TO ISLAM! I guess you can't get that through you rock head. Good luck in what ever you do because your going to need all the luck a person can muster.
2006-10-12 09:52:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't dislike anyone for their opinion and/or beliefs but I don't like Bush. No, there IS nothing good coming out of this war but if we impeached Bush we would have Cheney and I think that would be even worse. I don't know how anyone could support Bush either.
2006-10-12 09:46:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by ☼Earthbound Misfit☼ 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I totally agree with you!
Liberals claim President Bush shouldnt have started this war.
They complain about his prosecution of it.
One liberal recently claimed Bush was the worst president in US history.
Lets clear up one point:
President Bush didnt start the war on terror.
Try to remember,it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11.
Lets look at the worst president and mismanagement claims.
FDR led US into World War 2.
Germany never attacked US:Japan did.
From 1941-1945,450,000 lives were lost,an average of 112,500 per year.
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea.
North Korea never attacked US.
From 1950-1953,55.000 lives were lost an average of 18,333 per year.
John F.Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962.
Vietnam never attacked US.
Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire.
From 1965-1975,58,000 lives were lost an average of 5,800 per year.
Bosnia never attached US.
He was offered Osama Bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing.Osama has attacked US on multiple occasions.Over 2.900 lives lost on 9/11.
NOW,consider THIS:
In the two years after terrorists attacked US,President Bush liberated two countries,crushed the Taliban,crippled Al-Qaida,put nuclear inspectors in Lybia,Iran and North Korea without firing a shot,captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.....
We lost 700 soldiers ,an average of 350 a year.
Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
WORST president in history?Come on!
The democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking,!but...
It took less time to take Iraq that it took Janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound.That was a 51 day operation.
US have been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.
It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republication Guard than it took Teddy Kennedy to call the police after his OLDSmobile sank at Chappaquiddick.
It look less time to Iraq than it took to count the voted in Florida!!!!!!
2006-10-12 09:50:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I bet you were one of these new found patriots when 9/11 happened , then you found out they were using real bullets , and now you don't want war anymore . How do you think our fore-fathers got their freedom ? By sitting around protesting and singing kumbyah I don't think so !
2006-10-12 09:50:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
1⤋