English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

yes no doubt about it.....

2006-10-12 08:57:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes.

And the difference between Bush and Clinton is the Iraq War, stupid.

And yes, the Dems voted for the war, but they had the excuse of having been duped by BushCo "intelligence" along with the rest of America.

2006-10-12 08:57:59 · answer #2 · answered by jonjon418 6 · 0 0

I feel that the U.S. Government AND the Media misled us all... They're still at it.

2006-10-12 08:59:35 · answer #3 · answered by Islander 4 · 0 0

Bush lied to start this war - No reason to start telling the truth now. Soon as General Powell voluntarily left the Bush administration I knew this war was based on the willingness of Bush to go to war and not based on true intelligence. At least when Clinton lied nobody got killed.

(I SUPPORT OUR BRAVE TROOPS)

2006-10-12 09:08:56 · answer #4 · answered by Go Union 1 · 1 0

I think that this has already been established as fact. The question is, was the media misled, or complicit?

2006-10-12 09:06:44 · answer #5 · answered by josephine 3 · 0 0

Yes

2006-10-12 08:58:29 · answer #6 · answered by KC 2 · 0 0

Of course! Although why, I don't really get. As if anyone would have stopped them, whatever reason they would have given. Just look at Guantanamo et al. Not one bloody state in the whole world feels the need to do anything against it...

2006-10-12 08:59:46 · answer #7 · answered by Johanna F 1 · 0 0

no, i believe the gov. and the media misled America and the world.

2006-10-12 08:58:22 · answer #8 · answered by namvet68 2 · 0 0

Absolutely!

2006-10-12 08:56:59 · answer #9 · answered by anna8297 1 · 1 0

Then I guess the Clinton Admin misled everybody also because they all said that Sadaam had WMD's

2006-10-12 08:57:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

many months ago the found brand new Toyota truck, jeeps, tons of food and a lot of other stuff they did not mention buried at least 100 hundred feet under ground by Saddam...so unless they tear the whole complete country up for at least one hundred feet deep or maybe deeper..then maybe we could find the chemical weapons...why do you think Saddam had in his employ the worlds most terrible chemical weapons chemist working for him..because he liked her..no to build the chemical weapons...and he is on trial now for using them against his own people to test them before he used them on US....our and the worlds problem is we let him know we were coming for many many months....and it is most likely no one will ever find them..unless like i said we dig up every inch of the country and neighboring countries for at least one hundred feet deep....not to mention he just may have given them to other countries too.
so to your question NO!

2006-10-12 09:03:26 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers