Or is the fact that he is no longer president good enough? If that is good enough, will you stop bringing his name up? Or is that a necessary diversionary tactic from discussing what is going on in the world TODAY?
2006-10-12 07:33:23 · 4 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
hey, Jim? democrats = bad, republicans = good? My math teacher didn't have to work repeatedly with me...wonder why she did with you?
2006-10-12 07:45:46 · update #1
are you kidding they still bring up stuff from the Andrew Jackson Administration....
2006-10-12 07:36:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Much like your third grade math teacher had to work with you repeatedly to get you to understand fractions, we have to keep reminding Americans what a bad idea it is to elect a shylock as a President. Painful reinforcement of the truth is far more effective than relying upon past memories.
Example:
Kennedy=Drunk
Hillary=Egomaniac
Dean=Scarily off center
Daschle=Greasy
Kerry=Hypocrite
Liberal math sentences made easy!!!!
2006-10-12 07:43:53 · answer #2 · answered by Jim from the Midwest 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The best thing to do is keep him from getting back into the White House. Of course this means not electing Hillary to anything else.
2006-10-12 07:37:24 · answer #3 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Doesnt matter he's not in the White House anymore.
2006-10-12 07:36:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋