I know you believe we came from monkeys but have you ever thought that monkeys evolved from humans? Why haven't the evolutionists barked up that tree?
2006-10-12 06:35:34 · 14 answers · asked by RIDLEY 6 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
Let me start off by say that Azaleaeig is wrong on all accounts. To say that a why don't scientist put a tree in the dark and see if it grows. Don't be such a fool. It's fact that a plant needs light to grow, However it is not fact that Evolution is true. Trying to compare the two is just foolish.
As far as Darwin goes, I have news for you all. Darwin didn't Even believe in Evolution. He simply stated that it was an interesting Theory to look at.
The reason evolutionist haven't look at it from the aspect of monkeys came from humans is plain and simple. It doesn't fit their agenda. If they tried to look at it that way then they would have to toss away everything they have told people for years. If they would tell the truth of what they really know they would tell you that the entire idea of evolution is garbage. Their is no proof in evolution flat out no matter how you look at it and if you say different, then prove it. Just like I can't prove there is a God. Although in my heart I know he is real.
And just so all you people that say evolutionist don't think we came from monkeys. You are dead wrong. That's is exactly what evolution is all about. If you are going to believe in something then the least you can do is study it out.
Hope this helps and God Bless.
2006-10-13 08:24:22 · answer #1 · answered by ۩ Cuthbert ♂ 4 · 6⤊ 2⤋
An example: People/Science knows that house plants need light to thrive. That's what we are always told, and it is based on the fact that the process of plant growth is understood. Nobody says, "Why doesn't science bark up the tree of considering that plants will only grown in pitch-black-darkness?" People understand that the process is understood by science (and the general population for the most part).
People post questions on here about evolution that are based on their not having a solid understanding of the process of evolution that is understood and accepted by those who see that it looks like it makes sense and answers a bunch of questions. There is a lot of misunderstanding about what evolutionists say/believe/understand.
2006-10-12 07:16:55 · answer #2 · answered by WhiteLilac1 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is the common myth going back to the world's first reaction to Darwin that he said humans evolved from monkeys. What evolutions continue to prove is that monkeys, apes, gorrillas, humans and all other primates have a common ancestor. I would bet you there have been lots of scientists who have wondered if they could breed a new species of primates using the genes of monkeys, apes and gorrillas, just like humans have bred all kinds of bovines, canines and felines.
2006-10-12 07:20:19 · answer #3 · answered by dan_in_la 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Evolutionists don't claim humans evolved from monkeys or apes. They claim we evolved from a common primate ancestor, not documented in the fossil record.
And for the record, I am a creationist.
-Aztec276
2006-10-12 06:44:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
You seem lost. This category is social science, not biology or anthropology.
You seem confused. Creationists say that humans did not come from monkeys. Most people who believe in the Theory of Evolution believe that humanoids came from a common genetic ancestor. I don't know any who believe that humans come from monkeys or that the reverse is possible.
If the Theory of Evolution states that genetic changes which allow better adaption to the environment tend to be be passed on to future generations, why would you think that monkeys are better adapted to the environment than humans are?
There is no need to bark up an empty tree.
2006-10-12 06:49:25 · answer #5 · answered by Richard 7 · 6⤊ 4⤋
As species evolve, they become better adapted to their environment and are able to manipulate it to their advantage.
It is just illogical to believe that monkeys evolved from humans because that is a step backward in the evolutionary process.
With your reasoning, a human could eventually evolve into a one cell organism.
2006-10-12 06:50:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
We people share uncomplicated ancestors with the "monkeys" (chimps, gorilas and a few others). yet once you want to label an australopitecus afarensis (case in point) as a "monkey", pass forward. i'm able to't see something incorrect in descending from a "monkey".
2016-10-19 06:50:38 · answer #7 · answered by freudenburg 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is just another way satin has to deceiving people that there is no God only weak minded people believe such a thing as this and I pray may God have mercy on their soul!!!!
2006-10-12 06:54:29 · answer #8 · answered by face 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yea I think it goes both ways actually
2006-10-12 06:53:52 · answer #9 · answered by benji200426 1 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm sure they have...and where do you think Bigfoot came from?? eh? ;)
Ohhh Face, you shouldn't mock people if you can't even spell Satan!
2006-10-12 07:19:06 · answer #10 · answered by Sticky 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋